Saturday, November 29, 2014

Ben Afleck vs Bill Maher


Recently Ben Affleck was interviewed by Bill Maher and Bill went off on Ben for  blindly  defending islam. It was quite a confrontation.    A musim women responds to Ben Affleck's judgement.....................






One Muslim woman decided enough was enough and she let Affleck get a real dose of the horrors of Islam. She penned a letter that set the record straight and proved to Affleck just how wrong he really is. Posted in Pakistan Today, she wrote:

    Dear Ben,

    I am writing to you today as a woman who was born and raised in Islam. I saw your discussion with Bill Maher and Sam Harris, and I must say you did me a great disservice that day. Your heart was in the right place, of course, and it was lovely of you to step up and defend ‘my people’.

    What you really did though, perhaps inadvertently, was silence a conversation that never gets started. Two people attempted to begin a dialogue and you wouldn’t even listen. Why should any set of ideas be above criticism, Ben?

    Why are Muslims being ‘preserved’ in some time capsule of centuries gone by? Why is it okay that we continue to live in a world where our women are compared to candy waiting to be consumed? Why is it okay for women of the rest of the world to fight for freedom and equality while we are told to cover our shameful bodies? Can’t you see that we are being held back from joining this elite club known as the 21st century?

    Noble liberals like yourself always stand up for the misrepresented Muslims and stand against the Islamophobes, which is great but who stands in my corner and for the others who feel oppressed by the religion? Every time we raise our voices, one of us is killed or threatened. I am a blogger and illustrator, no threat to anyone, Ben, except for those afraid of words and drawings. I want the freedom to express myself without the very real fear that I might be killed for it. Is that too much to ask?

    When I wrote a children’s book that carried a message of diversity and inclusivity for everyone, my life changed. My book, ‘My Chacha (uncle) is Gay’ has the innocent anti-homophobia message, ‘Love belongs to everyone’. This was not palatable to many of my Muslim brothers and sisters.

    Since that project I have been declared an ‘enemy of God’ and deemed worthy of death. All because I want to help create a world where South Asian children too can have their stories told, so they too can know that love comes in all forms, and that that’s okay. My Muslim brothers and sisters were hit hard by this work because it addresses the issue of homophobia within our own community. It is not something they can pass off as ‘Western’ immorality. Just like they deny that any issues exist within the doctrine of Islam, many deny that homosexuality exists amongst good, ‘moral’ Muslims. Just like that, millions of people’s existence is denied. Please do not defend people who think this way, and let me tell you Ben, many ‘good’ Muslims do think this way.

    What you did by screaming ‘racist!’ was shut down a conversation that many of us have been waiting to have. You helped those who wish to deny there are issues, deny them. You became an instant hero, a defender of Islam. It’s kind, it really is. I understand because I too am plagued and affected by the issues brought about by actual Islamophobia. I have a Muslim name and brown skin, my peaceful relatives have been pushed in the subway and called ‘terrorist’ for no reason.

    I get that.

    We must distinguish critiquing an ideology from being hateful towards a group of people. And for this reason I think that tackling the issues within Islam should be two-pronged. They must be brought up, but simultaneously we should stress that blame for these issues cannot be placed on individuals.

    In the interest of being politically correct and ‘liberal’, we silence the voices of millions. I am turning to you because you were instrumental in starting this conversation. Those of us who want reform are muted by extremists, as well as the liberals who betray us in the name of multiculturalism.

    ISIS paints a horrific picture, so I understand the knee-jerk reaction to deny any link. Most Muslims choose to interpret scripture in a peaceful way, but that doesn’t mean the raw material isn’t there for those who choose the path of violence. That material must be addressed.

    Can we talk about the blatant double standards and violation of human rights, for a second? Mosques are built throughout western countries, usually without much issue. But in the hub of Islam, the heart of Islam, Saudi Arabia, no one but Muslims are allowed to officially practice their faith. There are no churches, temples or synagogues because Saudi Arabia will not permit any non-Muslim place of worship to exist. Who will hold them accountable for such injustice if we hush everyone who speaks out against Islam?

    What is so wrong with wanting to step into the current century? There should be no shame. There is no denying that violence, misogyny and homophobia exist in all religious texts, but Islam is the only religion that is adhered to so literally, to this day.

    In your culture you have the luxury of calling such literalists “crazies”, like the Westboro Baptist Church, for example. In my culture, such values are upheld by more people than we realise. Many will try to deny it, but please hear me when I say that these are not fringe values. It is apparent in the lacking numbers of Muslims willing to speak out against the archaic Shariah law. The punishment for blasphemy and apostasy, etc, are tools of oppression. Why are they not addressed even by the peaceful folk who “aren’t fanatical, who just want to have some sandwiches and pray five times a day? Where are the Muslim protestors against blasphemy laws/apostasy? Where are the Muslims who take a stand against harsh interpretation of Shariah? These sandwich-eating peaceful folk do not defend those suffering in the name of Islam, Ben, and therein lies our problem.

    Maybe the points Maher and Harris were trying to make are more easily digested when coming from within the community, I can appreciate that. That is why I am writing to you, as someone who has personally been hurt by the lack of acknowledgement of these issues.

    If Muslims do not critique their own atrocities, then people on the outside will and their message will not be listened to simply because of who they are. It’s a vicious cycle, one that can only break if indeed, like Harris said, true reformers are empowered.

    I ask you and anyone reading this to make an effort to seek out reformers from within our community, and support them in any way you can.

    If I were allowed to meet a man that is not my father, brother or husband unchaperoned, I would have loved to discuss this over drinks (which I am also not allowed to have) with you. So, you see, things must change.

    Sincerely,

    Eiynah

Just the way Eiynah ends the letter should make Affleck get off of his high horse and admit that he’s very, very wrong about Islam.

It might happen, and it might not.

The underlying problem here is Ben Affleck (and other liberal types) end up serving as de-facto spokespersons for Islam. Even though they have no idea what it’s like to be dominated by this sadistic religion.

If he decided to dive deep into the religion and learn about how evil it really is, he might change his tune.

At least you would hope he would.

Michael Brown vs. Miriam Carey


Michael Brown vs. Miriam Carey


Exclusive: Joseph Farah notes lack of public outcry for mom 'met with hail of gunfire'
Published: 19 hours ago

Joseph Farah is founder, editor and CEO of WND and a nationally syndicated columnist with Creators News Service.. He is the author or co-author of 13 books, including his latest, "The Tea Party Manifesto," and his classic, "Taking America Back," now in its third edition and 14th printing. Farah is the former editor of the legendary Sacramento Union and other major-market dailies.



Miriam Carey








I don’t get it.

There are national protests – even riots– over the police shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri. Brown was shot by one policeman after significant provocation and violence. The incident was thoroughly investigated by the national and international press. It was investigated by local police, who released findings to the public. A grand jury considered the facts and found no cause for charges against the police officer.

Meanwhile, Miriam Carey, a young black mother with her baby in tow, was gunned down in a hail of at least 26 gunshots by Capitol Police in Washington more than a year ago. She committed no crime, but made a wrong turn near the White House. Few facts have been publicly released, and all official video has been suppressed. Despite investigations by the police and Justice Department, no charges have been recommended against any police officers. There have been no demonstrations, the media have demonstrated a complete lack of interest in the case (with the exception of WND, which has covered the case with dozens of stories) and Barack Obama, Eric Holder, Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton have shown no interest.

In fact, on Wednesday, the Washington Post released its first major story on the Carey incident, confirming the shocking reporting of WND, over the last 13 months.

What’s the difference between these two cases?

For the life of me, the contrast between the Brown case and the Carey case couldn’t be more stark.

Experience more of Joseph Farah’s no-nonsense truth-telling in his books, audio and video products, featured in the WND Superstore

While the Justice Department is still investigating the Brown case, it long ago concluded there was “insufficient evidence to pursue federal criminal civil rights or local charges against officers from the U.S. Secret Service and U.S. Capitol Police.”

While Capitol Police have issued very little information to the few press inquiries it has received about the under-reported Carey case, it offered this response to the Washington Post for its Thanksgiving Day story: “There is more than sufficient evidence to show that under all of the prevailing circumstances at the time, the officers were acting in defense of themselves and others at the time they fired their weapons.”

The facts simply don’t support such a statement.

Disproportionate force was used by police against Carey. As the Post found:

    “In recent cases of motorists entering restricted areas, drivers have faced misdemeanor charges. Last May, Mathew Goldstein mistakenly followed the Obama daughters’ motorcade into the pedestrian section of Pennsylvania Avenue. A misdemeanor charge of unlawful entry was dropped.”
    “In September, the day after Omar Gonzalez sprinted into the White House, another man, Kevin Carr, allegedly drove into the same restricted area as Carey did and parked. He, too, was charged with misdemeanor unlawful entry. His case is pending.”

The Post story makes another interesting point: District of Columbia law states that an element of the crime of unlawful entry is the refusal to leave, making the act intentional. Carey did not refuse to leave. Indeed, she was trying to leave when she was met with a hail of gunfire.

Clearly, Miriam Carey panicked, probably because she had an infant daughter in her car seat when officers drew their guns.

Press reports repeatedly claimed that Carey drove from the scene leading cops on a high-speed chase. Again, the facts don’t support such claims.

In fact, she drove 1.3 miles from the White House checkpoint before she was killed. It took her four minutes, meaning she drive at an average speed of 19.5 mph in a 25-mph zone.

Police standards prohibit officers from firing at moving vehicles except in rare circumstances. But that didn’t stop the cops from emptying 26 rounds at the car, including the fatal shot or shots. D.C. police policy was broken that day – perhaps the only law actually broken.

No justice, no peace?

What about the case of Miriam Carey?

I still don’t get it.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/11/michael-brown-vs-miriam-carey/#RZcEoOd7VQZEfpLy.99



Luke 12:2-3

2 There is nothing concealed that will not be disclosed, or hidden that will not be made known. 3 What you have said in the dark will be heard in the daylight, and what you have whispered in the ear in the inner rooms will be proclaimed from the roofs.




Sunday, November 23, 2014

VERY GOOD NEWS


THIS IS GOOD NEWS FOR ALL ARABS AND MUSLIMS...because their God is the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob (Israel) as revealed in the Hebrew Torah...the God of the Holy Bible...NOT the "moon god allah" of the koran..................The muslims are VICTIMS of a great satanic illusion.............

THIS changed my understanding completely for I used to think Abraham's son  Ishmael was condemned as the "son of perdition"...THIS IS NOT SO ACCORDING TO THE HOLY BIBLE. I suspect mohammed is the "son of perdition" as he replaced the Abramic Covenant with allah and the koran.....totally mohammed's "creation"of illusion,   as he wrote the koran after being seduced by "the dark side.".    (Hmmmm....did satanic history repeat itself in Joseph Smith's "Book of Mormon?")



God's promise to the Arabs
Exclusive: Joseph Farah explains what is prophesied about future of his people


Joseph Farah is founder, editor and CEO of WND and a nationally syndicated columnist with Creators News Service.. He is the author or co-author of 13 books, including his latest, "The Tea Party Manifesto," and his classic, "Taking America Back," now in its third edition and 14th printing. Farah is the former editor of the legendary Sacramento Union and other major-market dailies.



Despite the suggestion that I am a self-hating Arab, quite the opposite is true.

You will never see me shy away from identifying myself as an Arab-American. I’m as eager to let people know about my ethnicity as any Italian or Irishman or Greek. I am intrigued by the Arab culture. I’m a student of it. I love many aspects of it. It’s why I was so pleased to become a Middle East correspondent many years ago.

And, as a Christian, I have searched the Scriptures to find out the fate of my people in prophecy and what promises God makes to them. I think most people would be surprised at what the Bible actually says.

There’s good news for Arabs in the Bible.

For instance, Abraham’s son Ishmael is often regarded as one of the fathers of the Arab people. While there was tension in the tents of Abraham over the casting out of Ishmael and his mother, Hagar, there was also reconciliation between Ishmael and Isaac, his brother from another mother, at Abraham’s funeral. (Genesis 25:8-9) The Bible tells us he had 12 sons who populated the area from Egypt to Assyria. (Genesis 25:17-18)

Recall also that God made specific promises to both Abraham and Hagar regarding Ishmael:

In Genesis 17:18-20, Abraham asks for a blessing upon Ishmael and God responds:

“And God said, Sarah thy wife shall bear thee a son indeed; and thou shalt call his name Isaac: and I will establish my covenant with him for an everlasting covenant, and with his seed after him. And as for Ishmael, I have heard thee: Behold, I have blessed him, and will make him fruitful, and will multiply him exceedingly; twelve princes shall he beget, and I will make him a great nation.”

Ishmael is to give rise to a great nation. What nation was that? What was the great nation that would come out of Ishmael? I’ve always been a little confused or puzzled about that. No doubt there have been nations founded by the sons of Ishmael that were great in the sense of terrible great. But is that all God meant? Did he mean the empires of Babylon, Assyria and Egypt? Did he mean terrible great in the sense of those past empires? Or is there more meaning in that term great? Is there yet a promise to Abraham yet to be fulfilled?



The promise is repeated to Hagar in Genesis 21:17: “And God heard the voice of the lad; and the angel of God called to Hagar out of heaven, and said unto her, What aileth thee, Hagar? fear not; for God hath heard the voice of the lad where he is. Arise, lift up the lad, and hold him in thine hand; for I will make him a great nation.”

So what was that nation promised to Ishmael?

Hagar and Ishmael were on their way back to Egypt, her native land. Ishmael later marries an Egyptian woman. There’s a definite Egypt connection here. And since we know Ishmael’s sons spread out in the lands from Egypt to Assyria, we have another clue.

So what is the fate of the great nations of Egypt and Assyria?

We find out in Isaiah 19:21-25:

Here’s the happy ending for Ishmael, Egypt and Assyria.

“And the Lord shall be known to Egypt, and the Egyptians shall know the Lord in that day, and shall do sacrifice and oblation; yea, they shall vow a vow unto the Lord, and perform it.

“And the Lord shall smite Egypt: he shall smite and heal it: and they shall return even to the Lord, and he shall be intreated of them, and shall heal them.

“In that day shall there be a highway out of Egypt to Assyria, and the Assyrian shall come into Egypt, and the Egyptian into Assyria, and the Egyptians shall serve with the Assyrians.

“In that day shall Israel be the third with Egypt and with Assyria, even a blessing in the midst of the land:

“Whom the Lord of hosts shall bless, saying, Blessed be Egypt my people, and Assyria the work of my hands, and Israel mine inheritance.”

Egypt, Assyria and Israel all one big happy family – imagine that! Egypt is called God’s people. Assyria is called the work of God’s hands. And Israel is His inheritance. One-third, one-third and one-third.

Wouldn’t father Abraham be happy about that?



Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/11/gods-promise-to-the-arabs/#jARs8m8VtSYPXFcq.99

BE AWARE AND BEWARE,,.....CRITICAL!


Have we completely lost our Congress and our country?  I personally believe our American political leaders have been seduced by an enemy they do not understand. (at lest I hope this is the case and that they are not traitors)  They don't realize that "if you play with FIRE you will get burned."  Thomas Jefferson wanted to know and understand the enemy WHICH IS WHY HE STUDIED THE KORAN!

THIS IS A LONG READ BUT IT IS CRITICAL THAT YOU TAKE THE TIME TO READ AND ABSORB IT.  BE AWARE AND BEWARE! (do not be fooled...allah is NOT the God of the Holy Bible)


http://shoebat.com/2014/11/14/muslim-allah-worshipped-praised-supreme-u-s-house-floor-shocking-video-must-watch/




Muslim ALLAH Worshipped and Praised SUPREME on U.S. House Floor 
By Shoebat Foundation on November 14, 2014 

By Walid Shoebat and Ben Barrack
**SHOEBAT EXCLUSIVE**

To all who get excited at the Republican victory, watch your idol-kings and your high-priests in their cathedrals, all burn incense to Ba’al, they all bow at the sound of the name of Allah, they all sleep with Islam, the harlot of Arabia. All your choicest American fatlings bow in lust like prostitutes:

    “She lusted after her paramours, whose genitals are like those of donkeys, and whose emissions are like those of horses. ” (Ezekiel 23:20)

With newly re-elected Speaker of the House John Boehner presiding AND BOWING HIS HEAD, the Imam for the Islamic Center of Central Jersey praised Islam’s Allah from the House floor as the God who reigns supreme. Here is the shocking video of Imam Hamad Chebli delivering the Islamic prayer; Boehner can be seen behind him: (see url at top)

Chebli didn’t just appear at the House floor; he also delivered Islamic prayers at the National Cathedral which was prepared for Muslim prayers with rugs.


Numerous speakers, including Cathedral officials and local Muslim leaders, echoed Rasool’s message [Muhammad's Message] about the urgent need for religious understanding and collaboration. Most made pointed references to the symbolism of the majestic Christian building, where they had gathered to pray and commune.

Rev. Gary Hall, dean of the Cathedral, spoke of St. Benedict, whom he said believed equally in the importance of prayer and hospitality. Marvelling at the sounds of Arabic prayers, which he called “a beautiful sacred language in a beautiful sacred space,” Hall said he hopes the service would serve as a beginning for future efforts to work together for good.

Rashid Makhdoom, a retired engineer from Potomac, said he believes the message and symbolism of the event would “reverberate throughout the world. It should be a lesson for Muslims everywhere that we and Christians are all one,” he said.

But that wasn’t all true, fortunately, there appeared a “Deborah”, “Jael” and a “Judith” in that one Christian woman made a scene when it became obvious that an act of conquest and harlotry was taking place, she screamed out:..(in protest and Christian apology)

We’re not talking about a harmless, moderate Imam here. Instead, we’re talking about a major devil. According to Chebli’s bio:

    “Early in his studies, a teacher named Hassan Khaled chose Chebli to serve at a neighboring mosque. Nearly four decades later, Chebli laughs as he recalls the puzzled expression of the mosques members when a lanky boy in glasses came to lead their prayers …[Hassan] Khaled, his mentor, was chosen Grand Mufti of Lebanon, the nations foremost Islamic legal scholar in the Sunni Muslim sect.”


Chebli’s mentor, Khaled, who was the Mufti of Lebanon was “martyred” after a bomb was set up which killed him and others. His father went the same way “martyred” by a bombing. Have a look at Khaled, the fiery revolutionist exhorting a crowd to chant, ‘Allahu Akbar': (see url at top)

The speech tone in Arabic is always different than what you find on the House Floor in English, of course, but we cannot attribute the man to be like his mentor, this would be ‘guilt by association’.

Khaled, the man’s mentor is even featured prominently on the official Muslim Brotherhood website.

And in the same footsteps as Khaled, Chelbi also traveled to Egypt to study at Al-Azhar University, the world’s oldest university and center for Brotherhood jurisprudence. It was during this time that Chelbi’s mentor Khaled was chosen as the nation’s foremost Islamic legal scholar in the Sunni Muslim sect.

'Charming' Hamad Chebli

Prior to Khaled’s fallout with the PLO’s Yasser Arafat, he was a champion and supporter of Palestinian terrorism against Israel to sending terrorist recruits from Lebanon.

The selection of Chelbi also appears to have significance relative to the U.S. policy in Syria. Both his mentor Khaled – and Khaled’s father – were killed by the Syrian regime. As such, Chelbi has an axe to grind when it comes to Bashar al-Assad. With news that the Obama administration is actually considering a policy based on an absurd premise that the best way to defeat ISIS is to remove Assad from power, Chelbi’s appearance at locations of national significance seem to coincide with this potential shift in U.S. policy.

Despite western portrayals of Chelbi as a moderate, he absolutely is not.

When it comes to Muslim prayers being delivered on the House floor or at the National Cathedral, unfortunately, this is not new. The precedent was set by Boehner’s predecessor – Speaker Dennis Hastert – less than one year prior to 9/11. As for the National Cathedral, none other than President George W. Bush shared a podium with Muzammil Siddiqi, then president of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA).

First up, on February 7, 2001, Chairman of the Dar al-Hijrah mosque Bassam Estwani delivered a prayer on the floor of the House as well. As the chairman of Dar al-Hijrah, Estwani represented perhaps the most notorious mosque on American soil. It was visited by three of the 9/11 hijackers and was home to Anwar al-Awlaki, the inspiration for the Fort Hood shooter. Estwani was the chairman of the mosque at that time:

As for the National Cathedral, on September 14, 2001, just three days after the 9/11 attacks, then President George W. Bush stood shoulder to shoulder with Siddiqi, the leader of the largest Muslim Brotherhood group in the U.S. and prayed with him:
ISNA President Muzammil Siddiqi (L) and George W. Bush (R) at National Cathedral on 9/14/01.(see url at top)



The Religious Freedom Coalition’s William Murray was in attendance at the Cathedral that day. Here is part of what he wrote about that day in his diary:

    As the service closed I felt the chill of the presence of the awesome power of God. I was clearly reminded of the very first of the Ten Commandments, THOU SHALT HAVE NO OTHER GODS BEFORE ME (Exodus 20:3). The National Cathedral had been defiled by prayers to a pagan moon god, Allah. Our Christian President had bowed his head to prayers offered to other gods, prayers that may have been for those who would destroy our nation and enslave our children to an alien religion. At that moment the hand of protection of the true God was removed from our nation.

    Since the Jihad attack on the United States on September 11th the President has surrounded himself with and sought advice from radical Islamic leaders who have openly called for the violent overthrow of the government of the United States. In addition, the President has invited six of the seven Islamic nations known to sponsor terror into his “coalition against terror”.

    By late Friday it became apparent to me that our nation was in fact not going to fight a war on terrorism, but rather follow the same old track of “punishing those who actually committed the crime.” This was not a “crime;” it was an act of war.

When it comes to New Jersey, that state’s Governor Chris Christie also has some incredibly disturbing alliances with questionable Muslim figures, as Shoebat.com has reported.

What’s more outrageous, the Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives allowing an Imam with multiple connections to individuals and groups whose stated goal is to take down the United States from within OR calling the Speaker a traitor for doing so? There will, no doubt, be those who think calling the Speaker a traitor is irresponsible, despite what he’s done.

THAT is what is the most outrageous.
Speaker John Boehner and Imam Chebli on November 13, 2014.(see url at top)



When Imam Hamad Ahmad Chebli of the Islamic Society of Central Jersey (ISCJ) took to the House floor on November 13th, he delivered a prayer that was blasphemous to Christianity. A cursory look at his background and affiliations will demonstrate that he doesn’t want to stop there. Delivering an Islamic prayer was about conquest. Boehner introduced Chebli and bowed his head in deference. It was Rep. Rush Holt (D-NJ) who two months earlier had invited Chebli to speak and who delivered a gushing introduction of Chebli:


Letter inviting Chebli to deliver Prayer. (see url at top)

So who exactly is Imam Chebli and does the Islamic Society of Central Jersey have anything to do with the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA)? This is important because in a 1991 document, the ISNA was named as having pledged to abide by the following statement:

    The process of settlement is a “Civilization-Jihadist Process” with all the word means. The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.

On September 8, 2012, ISCJ formally opened its new mosque. On hand was none other the Imam Mohammed Magid, President of ISNA and Rep. Holt:


Magid (far left), Chebli, (unknown), and Holt (far right) at opening of ISCJ mosque on 9/8/12. (see url at top)


Magid, Chebli, and Holt on September 8, 2012. (see url at top)

As for other highly questionable individuals Chebli has associated himself with, how about Amir Abdel Malik? There are several photos of Malik at the ISCJ giving speeches, leading prayer at the mosque, and even breaking bread with Chebli.

In 2006, at UC Irvine, Malik stood behind a podium that read, “Israel is the 4th Reich” and delivered an extremely anti-Semitic speech in which he mocked Ariel Sharon being in a coma; praised Jihadists who were willing to kill Jews; praised Hezbollah and Hamas; and insisted there is a “holocaust” and a “genocide” happening in the “Holy land” (Palestine). At different points in the speech, the crowd yells, “Allahu Akbar”.

Other quotes of note from Malik include:

    “Rupert (Murdoch) is a straight up Zionist Jew. Put THAT on Fox News.”

    “Your days are numbered. We will fight you. We will fight you until we are either martyred or victorious. That’s how we look at it.”

    “It’s about time (the Jews) live in fear.”

At one point, after suggesting that there will be “another 9/11″, Malik then says “they did it anyway” (implying that he’s a 9/11 truther).

See for yourself:

If you led a house of worship, would you embrace such a man? Chebli has. He’s even given Malik a microphone and allowed him to deliver sermons from the pulpit:


Amir Abdel Malik speaks at ISCJ with Chebli seated behind him (November, 2013). (see url at top)

 .

Abdel Malik and Magid are not the only individuals who believe in the conquest of the West, whom Chebli welcomed into his inner circle. Another Imam who has visited the mosque and received a tremendous welcome was Suhaib Webb; he is currently the Imam at the Islamic Society of Boston Cultural Center (ISBCC).

In addition to the Islamic Society of Boston (ISB) being founded by Abdurahman Alamoudi, a convicted terrorist, it was attended by the Boston Marathon bombers. Prior to traveling to Cairo in 2004 to attend Al Azhar University (also attended by Chebli), Webb was the Imam of the Islamic Society of Greater Oklahoma City (ISGOC), the same mosque attended by Alton Nolen, who beheaded a woman earlier this year.


Chebli (L) with Suhaib Webb (R) in 2014. (see url at top)

Webb will plead that all of that amounts to guilt by association but according to a man who used to attend ISGOC, Webb would preach sympathy for suicide bombers in Gaza but insist such sentiment not be spoken about outside the mosque.

Two days before the 9/11/01 attacks, Webb shared a podium with Anwar al-Awlaki at a fundraiser. Webb remains affiliated with the mosque where al-Awlaki served as an Imam (Dar al-Hijrah). The current Imam at Dar al-Hijrah – Shaker Elsayed – was once the Secretary General for the Muslim American Society (MAS) and admitted that the group was founded by leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood.


Webb speaking at ISCJ.(see url at top)

According to an FBI document, both Webb and al-Awlaki were affiliated with the MAS.

As Shoebat.com reported, in 2009, months before al-Awlaki’s inspired Jihadist Nidal Malik Hasan would murder 14 and injure 32 at Fort Hood, Webb attended the U.S.-Islamic World Forum (US-IWF), an event co-sponsored by the Brookings Institute and the Nation of Qatar. In the program, Webb was identified as being a member of the MAS. Future CIA Director David Petraeus was one of the featured speakers at the US-IWF event that year.


Petraeus at the US-IWF in 2009.(see url at top)

Webb’s troubling associations don’t end there. In 2008, he wrote about his visit to the mosque of Siraj Wahajj, who became infamous and notorious when it was learned that Sheikh Omar Abdelrahman (the “Blind Sheikh”) paid several visits to his Brooklyn mosque. The “Blind Sheikh” was convicted as a mastermind in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. Wahhaj was identified as an unindicted co-conspirator.


Siraj Wahhaj (left) and Suhaib Webb (right) circa 2008. (see url at top)

Webb gushed about his visit with Wahhaj, as Shoebat.com reported.

Speaking of Wahhaj, just weeks after the 9/11 attacks, he and Imam Chebli shared a podium at a Muslim town meeting in New Jersey that had connections to Muslim Brotherhood front groups:


Siraj Wahhaj and Hamad Chebli speak at even on 10/25/01. (see url at top)

One month later, with ground zero in New York City still smoldering, Chebli was far more concerned about fear mongering and the alleged mistreatment of Muslims than he was in lifting the veil that hid Muslim Brotherhood infiltration of the U.S. In November of that year, New Jersey’s Governor-elect visited Chebli’s mosque:

    The Justice Department has said that cooperation with the questioning will be voluntary, but that has not eased the concern in the Muslim community. That concern was apparent at the Islamic Center, where McGreevey made a brief appearance during afternoon services.

    Imam Hamad Chebli, the religious leader of the mosque, told 1,000 worshipers that federal agencies have rounded up almost 1,200 immigrants since the Sept. 11 attacks and have held most of them without charges.

    Chebli said some of those imprisoned have been deprived of their rights.

    “There are people whose families are waiting,” he said. “They don’t have any rights to make phone calls or anything. There are at least 5,000 people who are to be questioned. It could be any of you who hear the call from the FBI.”

On a webpage for Dar El Salam that has since been taken down, there is a list of Imams under the heading, “Our Imams”. The first one listed is Dr Muzammil H. Siddiqi, who served as President of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) from 1997-2001, which makes him a predecessor to Mohammed Magid, who was in attendance at the grand opening of Chebli’s mosque.

Chebli is also listed as one of the Imams on the Dar El Salam webpage.


George W. Bush and ISNA President Siddiqi on 9/14/01 at National Cathedral. (see url at top)

In the days after the 9/11 attacks, President George W. Bush embraced Siddiqi and even shared a pulpit with him at the National Cathedral just three days after the attacks.

Earlier this year, Shoebat.com published information about another New Jersey Muslim outfit, known as the Institute of Islamic Studies (IIS). This organization also has distinct ties to MAS. A prominent speaker for IIS is a man named Mazen Mokhtar, who is identified as, “the Executive Director of the Muslim American Society (MAS) National, a member of the New Jersey Chapter, and a member of the Board of Trustees of MAS.”

In 2004, the Washington Post tied Mokhtar to Osama bin Laden’s mentor Abdullah Azzam through a website named after Azzam:

    Mazen Mokhtar, an Egyptian-born imam and political activist, operated a Web site identified in an affidavit unsealed Friday by the U.S. attorney’s office in Connecticut. The Web site solicited funds for the Taliban and Chechen mujaheddin, according to the affidavit. It is an exact replica of Web sites operated by Babar Ahmad, who was arrested in England on a U.S. extradition warrant this week.

    The affidavit said the New Jersey home of the mirror Web site operator, identified on a Web site as Mokhtar, was searched in the recent past and that copies of Azzam Publications sites, operated by Ahmad, were found on Mokhtar’s computer’s hard drive and files.

Earlier this year, Mokhtar proudly displayed the Muslim Brotherhood symbol as his twitter cover photo:



What does all this have to do with Chebli? In 2005, the Islamic Society of Rutgers University held a Fast-a-thon and featured three speakers. Chebli and Mokhtar were two of them:


When it comes to New Jersey politics, the Governor of that state – Chris Christie – has some extremely questionable affiliations as well. In addition to the skepticism heaped on him for appointing Sohail Mohammed as a Superior Court judge, Christie took even more heat for befriending Imam Mohammed Qatanani, who has distinct connections to Hamas; Qatanani supported funding the officially designated Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) and was once even arrested by the Israelis for his membership with Hamas.

Chebli has served on at least one Board with Qatanani.

You can read about Christie’s disturbing connections to Sohail Mohammed and Qatanani at Shoebat.com, to include audio recordings of Christie praising Qatanani at the Governor’s mansion but in this space, let’s take a look at someone else Christie has elevated and who has connections to ISCJ.

His name is Ali Chaudry. In November of 2001, Chaudry was the first Pakistani elected as a U.S. Mayor. he served in that capacity until 2007. Here is a video of him giving an interview to a local news program after his election (note he’s identified as a Republican):

Chaudry is also a friend of and regular visitor to the ISCJ. Here he is inside the mosque with Chebli:


Imam Hamad Chebli and Ali Chaudry in 2013. (see url at top)

Last year, in a letter to Chaudy, Christie lauded the former Mayor and appointed him as a member of the New Jersey Commission on National and Community Service.

Christie_Letter_Chaudry_012913 (see url at top)

Incidentally, Chebli’s bio boasts of being appointed to the Governor’s Leadership Summit on Diversity, though the Governor who did so is not named. Based on Christie’s disturbing affiliations, he’d certainly qualify.

We may be getting closer to understanding why Boehner broke down on 60 Minutes after getting elected in 2010. Treason has a way of making you feel bad:

Now that you’ve watched that, take another look at this from November 13th: (see urla at top)


Share this:

The Palestinian Myth

 In 132AD Emperor Hadrian attempted to "settle" the "Israel" issue once and for all by renaming the territory of Judea after the Jew's foremost historical enemy...."Philistine" .....essentially "rubbing salt into the wounds of the Jews." Over time the name eventually morphed into "Palestine." Arabs ceased on this "name" as a political device to unify the Arab people and eventually destroy Israel "so that their name be no more." (Psalm 83:4)   The evidence of this Truth is revealed in the article below........

The Palestinian myth
Exclusive: Joseph Farah exposes nationhood claim as deception for Israel's destruction


Joseph Farah is founder, editor and CEO of WND and a nationally syndicated columnist with Creators News Service.. He is the author or co-author of 13 books, including his latest, "The Tea Party Manifesto," and his classic, "Taking America Back," now in its third edition and 14th printing. Farah is the former editor of the legendary Sacramento Union and other major-market dailies.


You might remember the late Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir making the bold political statement: “There is no such thing as a Palestinian people.”

The statement has been a source of ridicule and derision by Arab propagandists ever since. They love to talk about Golda Meir’s “racism.” They love to suggest she was in historical denial. They love to say her statement is patently false – an intentional lie, a strategic deception.

What they don’t like to talk about, however, are the very similar statements made by Arab leaders years after Meir had told the truth – that there is no distinct Palestinian cultural or national identity.

So, despite the fact that conventional wisdom has now proclaimed that there is such a thing as the Palestinian people, I’m going to raise those uncomfortable, candid quotations made by Arab leaders and his henchmen when their public-relations guard was down.

Way back on March 31, 1977, the Dutch newspaper Trouw published an interview with Palestine Liberation Organization executive committee member Zahir Muhsein. Here’s what he said:

“The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct ‘Palestinian people’ to oppose Zionism. For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan.”

That’s pretty clear, isn’t it? It’s even more specific than Golda Meir’s statement. It reaffirms what I have written on this subject. And it is hardly the only such statement of its kind. Yasser Arafat himself made a very definitive and unequivocal statement along these lines as late as 1993. It demonstrates conclusively that the Palestinian nationhood argument is the real strategic deception – one geared to set up the destruction of Israel.

In fact, on the same day Arafat signed the Declaration of Principles on the White House lawn in 1993, he explained his actions on Jordan TV. Here’s what he said: “Since we cannot defeat Israel in war, we do this in stages. We take any and every territory that we can of Palestine, and establish a sovereignty there, and we use it as a springboard to take more. When the time comes, we can get the Arab nations to join us for the final blow against Israel.”

No matter how many people convince themselves the aspirations for Palestinian statehood are genuine and the key to peace in the Middle East, they are still deceiving themselves. I’ve said it before and I will say it again: In the history of the world, Palestine has never existed as a nation. The region known as Palestine was ruled alternately by Rome, by Islamic and Christian crusaders, by the Ottoman Empire and, briefly, by the British after World War I. The British agreed to restore at least part of the land to the Jewish people as their ancestral homeland. It was never ruled by Arabs as a separate nation.

Why now has it become such a critical priority? The answer is because of a massive deception campaign and relentless terrorism over 40 years. Golda Meir was right. Her statement is validated by the truth of history and by the candid, but not widely circulated, pronouncements of Arafat and his lieutenants. Israel and the West must not surrender to terrorism by granting the killers just what they want – a public relations triumph and a strategic victory. It’s not too late to say no to terrorism. It’s not too late to say no to another Arab terror state. It’s not too late to tell the truth about Palestine.

Truth does not change. Truth is truth. If something was true 50 years ago, 40 years ago, 30 years ago, it is still true today. ....And the truth is that only 30 or 40 years ago, there was very little confusion on this issue of Palestine.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/11/the-palestinian-myth/#GQjIqVdp58uzijAE.99


Sunday, November 09, 2014

Pope Frances

 Recently Pope Francis has caused a lot of controversy when he said that Christ expects us to not judge and condemn people based on sexual preference and that  we should show compassion and respect for all humans, period.   I agree with him 100%, but then again,  how can Francis or ANY of us disagree with Jesus who commands us NOT to judge.........Matthew 7:1-2  “Do not judge, or you too will be judged. 2 For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you."


WELL........Frances' controversy doesn't end there......more recently he stated that Darwinian Natural Selection, the "Big Bang" and the existence of Extraterrestrials is NOT incompatible with the Bible.  Frankly, I expect Creationists and Fundamental Christianity to reject ANYTHING Pope Frances or any Pope says on any topic, theological or otherwise,  because it is obvious the Protestant Reformation is sadly "alive and well" in the 21st Century, maybe even worse today than back in Martin Luther's day.  ALL men love to JUDGE others! The Islam religion suffers the same divisions although they tend to deal with it VIOLENTLY and drag everyone else into the battle.

(When I reflect on the Protestant Reformation I feel as though it was a typical "throw the baby out in the bath water" situation. I read Martin Luther's books and I could not come to any other conclusion. I suspect the over 500 denominations of Christianity is not what Christ had in mind when He prayed...."Be One in Spirit.")

The article that covers the Pope's statements are at .... ...http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2014/10/27/No-Big-Bang-Without-God-Says-Pope  The topic was particularly popular with hundreds of diverse comments from people all over the world from all religions including atheism, a "religion" in spite of what they think of themselves!

I commented on two of the many comments........


  Carrie Singer's comment......"If you put evolution and creation together, you get Ancient Aliens theory.

My comment.......

EXACTLY......and the EVIDENCE is found IN THE BIBLE.

What I find ironic is Creationists who believe that the Bible is Truth reject the reality of extraterrestrial life....an obvious contradiction because the Bible reveals there are "Angels", amongst other "Heavenly Beings." "Angels" are NOT from Earth...THEREFORE.... they are "Extraterrestrial." Since ET's are REAL (contrary to popular belief) it is obvious that the Bible is ABSOLUTELY God's Word of Truth. It is obvious that Creationists have a difficult time dealing with the fact that God's Kingdom is composed of "other" beings in "other" parts of God's Cosmos and that they are composed of substance different than our present "fallen" biological state. When I share these ideas directly with Creationists they usually respond to me with the following...yah,,,,"BUT they are Angels, not physical beings." How do we know what they are....saying they are "supernatural" beings is a "cop out" ..because we ASSUME God's Laws are broken by them, how do we know that? God's Laws are PERFECT, we are far from understanding all of God's Laws, the "supernatural" is a human convention to cover things we do not understand. The Science we know today sure was "the supernatural" less than 50 years ago!  (consider "Quantum Entanglement."....it is NOT fantasy but sure looks like it and I doubt computer companies would invest billions of dollars on mere fantasy!)  Quantum Entanglement, what Einstein called "an all too spooky" phenomena, is a strange entanglement of subatomic particle pairs such that if the quantum spin is changed in one member of the pair. its' other member changes exactly the same amount and exactly at the SAME time, (instantaneously).... NO MATTER HOW FAR APART THEY, even light years!...... a side note:.....many Christians today wonder if we are near the time of the return of Jesus Christ to restore Earth to God's Cosmic Kingdom.  Biblical Prophecy appears to point to all the "signs" that it may be possible.  Maybe Science is one of those "signs" as well making it seem that the words French Chemist Pierce Berthelot  spoke in 1969 at a Science symposium in Paris are true ..........."I believe there will come a time when man will know all there is to know about the atom and the Great Architect will  come down and say..'Gentlemen, it is CLOSING time!'"  Planck limit anyone? 

All we know about Angels is they are not in a "fallen" state as mankind is.  Some have told me they do NOT have "Free Will".....then how do you .explain Lucifer and the 1/3rd "fallen" Angels?

 Science says Genesis is incompatible with Cosmology and Evolution. Creationists say Science is incompatible with Genesis and so strongly that they have replaced true Science with pseudoscience which sadly has become an instrument of control by the "elite powers" that influence world economies. (ie; global warming hoax)  I also find it ironic that Creationists accept micro-evolution yet reject macro-evolution. (Actually,  they have no choice because antibiotic resistance in pathogens cannot be denied and is a serious medical issue.)  Science has revealed that the processes occurring in the microscopic world are reflected in the macroscopic. ie; the biochemical processes that occur in a multicellular organism are the same processes that occur in a single cell.

The problem is NOT that Genesis is wrong....it is the interpretation of the Hebrew in Genesis that is misunderstood because there was no "Science" when Genesis was written, therefore the explanation of Creation was based on what was observable as the ENTIRE Cosmos.  God's gift of Science given to man, because we are Created in His Image, has revealed so much more of God's Creation and His PERFECT laws. Sadly, Creationists have insisted on a literal interpretation that requires a "supernatural" explanation of Creation. The "supernatural" is an illusion created by man's limited understanding of God's Laws. (The "supernatural" is the un-discovered natural....Kreskin)  God is PERFECT therefore His Laws are PERFECT....therefore the idea of God violating His Laws is non-sequitur.

There are two other problems that needs to be addressed when discussing God and Creation.......  

The first is Time and Space.......

Science assumes a "beginning" to Existence. The discovery of the "Big Bang" seems to answer that question. Creationists require a "beginning": as well and Genesis answers theirs. It is ironic Creationists reject the "Big Bang" when in reality it supports their literal interpretation of Genesis! The Bible is clear that God Existed before the Creation in Genesis 1, therefore Existence always was and always will be. Therefore there is NO "beginning" to Existence.  Thankfully, many Cosmologists today no longer assume  a "single" Big Bang that caused "Existence" but now suspect an INFINITE number of Big Bangs in a Multiverse of Creations.  This idea is much more compatible with God's Word because Genesis reveals the Eternal God Existed BEFORE Genesis AND before "our" Big Bang.

BTW.....mathematics reveals that the "beginning" of the Big Bang was a  "singularity"......ALL the matter and energy in our Cosmos condensed into a point smaller than 1 X 10-33cm..the Planck limit. (before you laugh at mathematics, remember, Einstein's Theories were discovered mathematically BEFORE they were verified by the Scientific Method.)  Science will NEVER be able to probe this "space" to verify these theories because it would require a Large Hadron Collider 100,000 LIGHT YEARS in diameter.....the one we have in Geneva,Switzerland is only 17 miles in circumference! The significance of this is that "Mathematics is the NEW and FINAL Science."  The mathematical evidence that supports the eternal  "Multiverse" is that Cosmologists now suspect that the center of a "black hole" is also a "singularity."   Mathematically, the Big Bang "singularity" and the "black hole singularity" are IDENTICAL.  If this math is true (and that equal sign between the equations 2 expressions means truth) ......when we observe a "black hole" we are looking at the "backside" of another Big Bang's Cosmos and vice versa.  (see next comment to "bubbathegreat" below.........)

Pope Francis is right in saying that the "singularity" that "inflated" into our Cosmos was initiated by God. Ironically, French Chemist Louis Pasteur revealed 142 years ago that this idea of God is much more reasonable than  Stephen Hawking's claims there is no initiation needed (therefore no God) to "inflate" a singularity into a Cosmos.  He assumes the Laws are such that "they" activate "themselves."  (I suspect Hawking's problem is the same as everyone else's.....a "need" for a beginning to Existence and an anthropomorphic God.) Pasteur's "S" shaped flask experiments proved the Law of Biogenesis....."All Life MUST come from pre-existing Life."  This Law implies no beginning and no end because it requires the existence of Life. Ironically, Science celebrates Pasteur's proof that "spontaneous generation" is impossible then Science illogically claims that it happened at least once.   "What a paradox!"  What is this "force" that drives life?......  GOD!  Pasteur PROVED the Existence of God but no one noticed!

The Second is the Nature of God.......


If Genesis is interpreted to mean the Creation of Existence, the Cosmos we exist in would be SEPARATE from God...ANOTHER non-sequitur.  The Hebrews were the first humans God revealed Himself to and the Hebrews understood this God to be SPIRIT....not an "anthropomorphic super being."  2000 years ago, as prophesied by the Hebrew Prophets, this "God" Incarnated in the "flesh" as Yeshua Ben Joseph, Jesus the Christ of God. Christianity teaches that He came to reconcile and restore mankind to the Kingdom of God by His Sacrifice on the Roman Cross.  YES......thankfully He did this but He did so much more than MOST of Christianity realizes. Jesus revealed that the TRUE God dwells within us and works through us and His PERFECT Laws.   God requires that we have the Faith of a Child.  What kind of faith does a child have?  INFORMED FAITH that manifests itself in TRUST.  God does not require or demand "blind faith" that too  often leads to religious fanaticism that affects all religions. Christianity went through it in the middle ages and now Islam is at it.  uuuugh!  When my Granddaughter says Grandpa, catch me as she jumps off the stairs into my arms BEFORE I really get a good chance to brace myself, she TRUSTS me because she knows I will not drop her.  That's true faith..NOT blind.    St. Thomas did not believe that Jesus was Resurrected until he placed his fingers into the wounds of Crucifixion. When he did ....he believed.  Jesus said...."Thomas you believe because you have seen, BLESSED are they that believe yet have not seen."   Is he asking for "blind faith?" I think not....informed faith through God's Inerrant Word is a GIFT..

The evidence of the true God revealed in Christ that God dwells within  is found in the following.....Psalm 82:3-6, Colossians 1:27, Galatians 3:26-28 and John 14:8-23. 


Yes, God's ways are far above man's but I have no doubt that God was talking about LOVE, COMPASSION,  FORGIVENESS, and  HOLINESS....NOT SCIENCE that reveals God's PERFECT Laws.


A liberal's comment..............."a big bang cannot create anything of value."


..It wasn't a "bang" or "explosion"...it was an INFLATION of "time and space" from a "singularity"  (condensation of ALL matter and energy) ... smaller than 1 X 10-33cm. (Planck limit)  In addition, recent Comological Theory suggests  that these "singularities" are infinite in number creating a "Multiverse" of Realities. These new theories were revealed through mathematical extrapolation. The Scientific Method can not be applied to test these theories because in order to "probe" the Planck limit a Large Hadron Collider would have to be greater than 100,000 LIGHT YEARS  in diameter. (our LHC in Geneva is only 17 miles in circumference.) The "Final Frontier" in Science is MATHEMATICS. Before you dismiss this as fantasy, remember Einstein discovered General Relativity mathematically BEFORE it was verified Scientifically. (If you dismiss Einstein's discoveries as fantasy, there is no further need to discuss reality with you.)  I submit that "our" Big Bang, one of an infiite number because of an Infinite God,...is of GREAT value.....the beauty of Existence.....a "MIRACLE!"

Thursday, November 06, 2014

CONSUMERISM vs GOD

There is a simple explanation of why consumerism has dominance over spiritual issues for most people.......it is because .people, including Christians and Jews,  do not REALLY know the God revealed in the flesh by Jesus Christ. As soon as one does.....material things become secondary to that person's hearts desire.  This is more difficult for Jews because their faith is limited to faith in the Torah where Christians have no excuse because  Jesus Christ reveals the true God.  Obviously consumerism blinds many Christians from knowing God,

I suspect that the cause of not truly understanding and therefor not knowing  the true God, leavng a person to fall for the illusion that materialism is the true source of happiness,  is that both modern Judaism and Christianity (and all other religions and New Age as well)    has presented a God that is very different than the God revealed in the Torah and Incarnated in the person of Yeshua Ben Joseph (Jesus THE Christ).......the God revealed to the Jews and Incarnated in Jesus Christ is Spirit, NOT a "supernatural" anthropomorphic God who is external to Creation. (As illusionist Kreskin said..."The supernatural is the undiscovered natural.")  The Laws of God are PERFECT because God is PERFECT therefore requiring God to violate His PERFECT Laws is nonsequitor.

Ironically, 142 years ago the French Chemist Louis Pasteur scientifically proved that God is not external to Creation in his "s" shaped flask experiment that revealed God's PERFECT Law of Biogenesis...."All life MUST come from pre-existing life."  You can place all the organelles and biochemicals and DNA/RNA into a viable plasma membrane "bubble"  and no matter what you do....IT WILL NOT BE ALIVE OR LIVE....period!...What's missing?  GOD!   When a cell goes through mitosis (division)  it distributes everything evenly and obviously that includes God's Spirit or cells would not be able to "live" and we wouldn't be here to discuss God!

So...how can a person know God IF they truly desire to WANT to know Him?..............

Simple....If people would pray and THEN read Psalm 82:3-6, Colossians 1:27, Galatians 3:26-28 and John 14:8-23 WITHOUT preconceived or pretaught ideas they would realize that they are rejecting themselves when they are not in communications with God BECAUSE God is within your heart.......when you reject God you reject yourself.....therefore....try to get into the habit of praising and praying to God 24/7...trust me....constantly tell God you love Him and your life WILL change!!!!  I know it is hard to do especially with the evil in this world but remember...we are MORE than victors in Christ Jesus!

Sunday, November 02, 2014

Theism vs Atheism



I believe the the arguments for and against  belief  in God depends on the definition of God.  If you accept that the God of human religions (including traditional Christianity) is real, it is quite easy to assume there is no God.  I myself am an "atheist" to such a God because the God revealed to the Hebrews in the Torah and the God Incarnate in the person of Yeshua Ben Joseph (Jesus the Christ) in the New Testament is SPIRIT,  NOT a "supernatural" anthropomorphic "super being" that is external to Creation.  The illusion of the "supernatural" is a human convention used to resolve that which he does not understand.  The illusionist "The Amazing Kreskin"  is quoted as saying "the supernatural is the undiscovered natural" and the scientific discovery of "Quantum Entanglement" sure seems to support his statement! 

The problem for both theists and atheists is a "need" for a "beginning" to existence and an incorrect definition of God.    Christians, I believe have a incorrect interpretation of Genesis. Based on genealogy of human generations in the Torah/ Bible, they claim the planet and the entire Cosmos is 6000 years old.  A more accurate interpretation of Genesis based on a correct translation of the Hebrew is that there are billions of years between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2. Rejection of  true science by Christian Theologians forces them to alter scientific truth to "fit" their error in translation of the Hebrew and their literal interpretation.  Sadly, this error created a "slippery slope" that has lead to mistrust and even fear of science with "pseudoscience" replacing true science as the source of "truth." (ie; acceptance of man made global warming based on emotion instead of scientific facts. I submit one quick statement to suggest global warming caused by man is an illusion........CO2 is a BUFFERED gas!)

Unfortunately, Scientists, especially atheistic ones, also fall for the illusion of a "beginning" to existence. The Big Bang Theory was the scientific evidence needed to support this. (Ironically, traditional Christianity that believes in a "beginning" rejects the Big Bang, an oxymoron if there ever was one.) The Bible reveals that God always existed before Genesis 1 and infact,  many "other" beings as well.  Biblical evidence of this fact is the revelation of a battle in Heaven (space?) between Angelic factions before Earth was formed. In addition to this, Christianity, in order to resolve the Hebrew Elohim "plural"  problem in Genesis 1:26 created the un-Biblical doctrine of the "Trinity".....God the "Father, Son and Holy Spirit" which ironically would be more Biblical evidence of "existence" before Genesis Creation.  Confusing to say the least..no wonder Muslims say Christianity is not a monotheistic religion.

It is logical to assume that Genesis was not a record of the Creation of existence but merely an account of the creation of "our" existence.   When Genesis was written, what was observed was the entire Cosmos and there was essentially NO science as we understand it today. In fact today,  science is questioning a "single" Big Bang and with mathematical extrapolation it has expanded creation beyond the observable Cosmos to the possibility of a "Multiverse." (Bubble Theory)  It seems that science and Genesis are not only compatible....they support each other.  The truth is that existence and reality never had a beginning and it will never have an end.

How God is defined is critical in discussing existence.  Saying there is no God requires a beginning to existence that was created from NOTHING. Since there is no beginning to existence, there was never a time of NOTHING. Stephen Hawking in his recent book declares that the Laws of Physics do not require initiation of a force to trigger existence.  Sorry....that requires more blind faith than believing in an anthropomorphic supernatural God!  There was never a "start" to the Laws of Physics because they always existed!  (FYI.... the "singularity" at the center of a black hole has been mathematically discovered to be identical to the "singularity" that inflated into "space/time" in the Big Bang suggesting a black hole is the reverse side of another "Big Bang."  Our Cosmos might look like a black hole from one of these Bubble Universes. Many Cosmologists say that the Laws in these other infinite numbers of Cosmoses may be very different than those working in ours. Since I am a biologist and embrace a Universal Cell Theory, I also suspect the Laws of Physics that govern our Cosmos are identical in all the others. In fact, I would extend the Cell Theory to all other worlds.

The reason I believe there is no beginning to existence and that God is the SPIRIT of existence and dwells within and works THROUGH Creation and His PERFECT Laws is not just revealed in *Biblical interpretation and Laws of Physics but was actually PROVED over 140 years ago by French Chemist Louis Pasteur.  Obviously no one paid attention!  Pasteur's simple "S" shaped flask experiment is celebrated by science as disproving "spontaneous generation" and establishing the Law of Biogenesis......"All Life MUST come from pre-existing Life." What is ironic is science then asserts that spontaneous generation was a **gradual process that created the first cell and through the process of Darwinian Natural Selection created all the diversity of life that we observe.  Obviously Darwinian Natural Selection is a mechanism of the creation of new species but unfortunately, because of the rejection of the true God revealed by the Bible, Christ and Pasteur, science is not aware of the creation of advanced sentient life (like Adam and Eve) by recombinant DNA hybridization by God THROUGH His creation revealed in Genesis 1:26-27..... "26 Then God said, “Let US make mankind in OUR image, in OUR likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals,[a] and over all the creatures that move along the ground.”27 So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them."  (The female Eve was obviously created by modified cloning of Adam using induced pluri-potent adult stem cells from Adam's  "rib marrow."  The "Y" chromosome from one cell was deleted and replaced with an "X" chromosome from another and the resulting "XX" karyotyped cell was induced to begin cleavage and placed into surrogate uterus where gestation was completed and 9 months later "baby Eve" was born.  After Eve grew to a mature women she was presented to Adam and he exclaimed..."at last, this is flesh of my flesh and bone of my bone, I shall call her women because she comes from man. " (Genesis 2:18-23) Modified cloning sure "fits" the Scripture!

 Genesis 1:26-27 Scripture explains why people claim to have witnessed seeing extraterrestrial beings that look exactly like we  do, in fact....the Bible tells us to be kind, respectful and courteous to everyone we meet "because we never know when we may be entertaining an Angel."   BUT Angels are "supernatural"...so....we simply don't understand their nature yet and by definition they are extraterrestrial because they are NOT from Earth.

* references: Psalm 82:2-3, Colossians 1:27, Galatians 3:26-28 and John 14:8-23  God is the SPIRIT of life that dwells with us.  People look for God in the wrong places because they don't know Him. At least atheists are not looking in the wrong places......they are not looking anywhere! Sadly however, they are closer to the real God than they care to know...HE IS INSIDE OF YOU AND MAKES YOUR BEING. He is not out there in space someplace.

** not possible because it requires the violation of the Laws of Thermodynamics.  ie; protein enzyme catalysis of biochemical substrates are necessary for formation of stable products and codes for the sequence of amino acids in an enzyme are transcribed from nucleic acids (DNA/RNA) which require enzymes to exist in the first place. Biogenesis unequivically proves there is no "beginning" to existence.

Theists may say that God's ways are so far above man's understanding that we can never understand reality which is revealed in the Bible. I am very sure the Bible was referring to Love, Compassion, Forgiveness, and Morality...NOT science!

I have no doubt that my ideas will be considered fantasy by both theists and atheists. Maybe agnostics might consider my ideas possible?

Peace....David Brown- W2TSA