Sunday, March 19, 2017

AN INCONVENIENT FACT


                                               AN INCONVENIENT FACT

Now that half of the people have had the last 2 months to express their support and love for President Donald Trump and his plan to "save" America from Novus Ordo Seclorum, mostly on social networks and very little coverage in the mainstream media, AND half the people have expressed their insanely  emotional  hatred and fear of him  to the level of impeaching or worse assasinating him  on social networks, AND with  HUGE coverage in the mainstream media , IT IS TIME FOR REVEALING AN INCONVENIENT FACT........

The anti-Trump movement has based their displeasure on the fact that "their" candidate won the popular vote and it was the “alleged” unconstitutional Electoral College (which BTW has been constitutional over the last 200 years) that robbed them of their choice for President. We already know Trump blew away Clinton in electoral votes!  (270 required..Trump 304, Clinton 232)  The SIMPLE INCONVENIENT FACT is that IF the popular vote in New York and California were subtracted from the total...President Trump would have WON the popular vote by  3, 131,876  votes instread of losing the popular vote by  2,864,974 votes with California and New York!    (look it up......http://cookpolitical.com/story/10174) 
There  are 50 states......do you really want the President of the United States determined by just 2  high population liberal states?  If you do you have no clue what a Republic is and you are obviously a selfish liberal yourself hypocritically claiming FAIRNESS. America is a Republic Democracy.  We conservatives had to live through the last 8 years of liberal policy! The genius of the founders of our country is that they realized that a true Democracy needed a protection mechanism to prevent a “demographically  skewed popular vote” determining the outcome of an election.   Last year's election was a validation of the needed protection if the  Electoral College.  I live in New York...I would gladly give up my vote to protect true Democracy!   Just because California and New York have the most liberal minded people doesn’t mean they are the “guardians” of what is best for America….true Democracy is suppose to determine that.

Tuesday, March 07, 2017

Aam and Eve


 
COMMENT I MADE TO FOLLOWING CREATION SITE…….



http://creationrevolution.com/adam-morality-gospel-authority-scripture/



MY COMMENT



God is PERFECT therefore His Laws are PERFECT. The "supernatural" is NOT a violation or suspension of those Laws BECAUSE they are PERFECT . The "supernatural" is a human convention to label phenomena that is not yet understood and whose Laws governing such phenomena have not been discovered yet.

A basic principle of Science is that discovering the mechanism of how something is evidence of the Laws that govern the phenomena. The assumption that many Scientific discoveries are incompatible with the Bible is an illusion. It is the interpretation of the Bible that often contradicts Scientific discovery. Fundamental Christianity claims the Creation of Adam and Eve revealed in the Book of Genesis is incompatible with the popular Scientific explanation of Darwinian Natural Selection. Ironically this is one case where the Fundamentals are correct and Science is sadly wrong!

The real Science behind the Creation of Adam and Eve has been discovered AND is compatible with the Genesis account, however,  because most people in the Scientific community rejects the Truth and Wisdom revealed in the Bible, they are totally unaware that Science has discovered how God did it!  There are some in Science who do believe in God yet still embrace evolution as the mechanism of Adam and Eve's Creation which is most definately incompatible with Genesis.  God could have used evolution to do it because ALL His Laws are PERFECT but that is not what He revealed in Genesis. There has to be another explanation that IS compatible with God's Word and is based on Laws Science has discovered AND  there IS, yet the Scientific community AND the religious comuunity are oblivious to this Truth. The religious community would reject this Truth because they fear that Science is not just incompatible..it is dangerous and destroys God's Word and sadly they have embraced pseudoscience which creates illusion that enslaves all men and threatens our freedoms. Most in the Scientific community wiould reject this Truth becausethey reject God.

The  Creation of Adam and Eve revealed in Genesis expalined through God's PERFECT Laws of Science.........

Genesis....  "God Created man in His Image from the "dust" of the Earth and "breathed life"into man. Carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen and phosphorous are elements found on this planet..."dust of the Earth."  Science has discovered the the basic chemical of "life" that records the "genetic codes" that determines the protein enzymes present in a living cell that determines the biochemistry that occurs in the cell which determines what an organism is....moneran, protist, plant fungus or animal.  The five elements of  "dust" are the elements that make up that "recording" chemical...deoxyribonucleic acid..DNA.  Science claims man evolved from Simian ancestors. Since the the human genome (DNA codes)  is 98% identical to Simians, it is understandable Science would embrace the evolution explanation, however, this explanation is impossible because the ONLY source of "new and natural" genetic codes needed for Natural Selection is via DNA mutation of which 99% are "lethal" and produce defective proteins. Less than 1 % of any possible "positive" mutations occur in germ tissue that produce sex cells...the ONLY ones that pass on the genetic codes to future offspring for selection to occur.  The reason this is critical is because there simply was NOT enough "time" between Simians and Hominids. The ONLY other explanation is that God Created Adam via Recombinant DNA Hybridization...."dust of the Earth."   The 2% difference in DNA reveals that this "new" DNA and its' code was NOT from Earth and proves we are truly "Children of God"  just as the Bible says. This 2 % DNA that makes us human came from the Kingdom of God...NOT from Earth.  Note: the "breathed" issue......I suggest this refers to arobic cellular respiration.

Eve's Creation......

Genesis.....Adam was not happy with the indigenous females..they were NOT of hs "flesh." God saw Adam needed a help mate. He placed Adam into a "deep sleep",  removed a "rib" and covered it with "flesh and bone" Creating Eve. When God presented her to Adam, Adam exclaimed...."at last, this is flesh of my flesh and bone of my bone, I will call her women BECAUSE SHE COMES FROM A MAN."

Scientifically explained and 100% compatible with the Scripture......

The "rib" is an easily accessible and rich source of adult stem cells. Adult stem cells are easily "reset" to an earlier embryonic state using determinant enzymes. ( called IPS cells...."Induced Pluripotency) Note: We are doing this today in growing various tissues and organs.) Two IPS cells are required. The "Y" chromosome (DNA) is removed from one and is discarded..the cell is saved.   The "X" chromosome is removed from the second IPS cell and is inserted into the nucleus of the first. The second cell is discarded.    The altered first cell is induced to begin cleavage and form a blastocyst that is placed into a surrogate "womb" (probably in vitro) where morphogenesis gestation is completed in 9 months and "baby Eve" is born. I suggest that the "deep sleep" of Adam was not a surgical anesthetic but a form of suspension because Eve was a sexually mature young women when she was presented to Adam.  There is no question that this explanation is compatible with the Scripture because she came from a man and was his flesh and bone and blood etc.  (modified cloning)  (Good thing the "Y" was replaced with an "X" or it would have been "Adam and Steve?"  uuugh!

About the Son of God, Son of Man.... Yeshua ben Joseph..Jesus the Christ of God.........

Merriam (Mary) was a Jewess Virgin. She conceived Jesus via the Holy Spirit of God using God's PERFECT Laws once again.  Jesus was obviously a "Hybrid God-Man"....23 human chromosomes (DNA) from His Mother Mary and 23 "DIVINE" chromosomes (DNA) from God.  Half man and half God...no wonder He had those "powers."

Of course the MOST important fact about Jesus is that our planet and all people who accept His Truth (John 14:6)  are RESTORED to God's Kingdom..the Infinate Cosmic Family through His Death, Burial, and Resurrection, Our planet will soon be RESTORED upon Jesus RETURN as King of Kings and Lord of Lords EXACTLY the same way He left 2000 years ago..Acts 1:8-11.  AND there is a lot of Science involved in that "cloud" Jesus dissappeared into. (saved for another time)

The views expressed inmy comments will never be understood by the religious or atheists untill they and all humanity understand the True God revealed in the "flesh"in the Incarnation iof Jesus Christ 2000 years ago. Jesus said that He and the Father are ONE and if we repent, accept and obey He and the Father on the Spirit will "live within us."   This statement of Jesus cannot be understood until one understands the Hebrew word for God...."Elohim." and the Genesis  Scripture..."Let Us Create Man in OUR Image,"

In Christ...David























Monday, February 27, 2017

FAKE NEWS IS FAKE

FAKE NEWS HAS A PURPOSE AND WHETHER IT IS GOOD OR BAD FOR SOCIETY DEPENDS ON WHAT SIDE YOUR ON.......The question is which side's fake news is best for society in general.
What's hysterical but also sad about this is that fake news FAKES the fake news. Fake news started with Walter Kronkite and it has evolved into what we think is absolute reality today. Fake news has serious consequence for BOTH sides of an issue. If you were willing to accept ANY wisdom revealed in the ancient writings that were consolidated 2000 years ago into the anthology we call the Bible, two Truths would stand out.....(1) .the great liar Lucifer revealed through Josef Goebbels in WWII that "truth" can be altered easily through lies....."Tell a lie big enough and long enough and it becomes absolute Truth" and (2) Truth is NOT controlled by Homo sapiens...ANY of them from Adam and Eve to today..... “For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.” (Ephesians 6:12)
All humans are "victims" and the "elite" power brokers of the world who "think" they are controlling the planet socially and economically are the most pathetic of all "victims." This TRUTH explains why Yeshua ben Joseph (Jesus the Christ) "begged in agony" from the Roman Cross for His persecutors ..."Father forgive them for they know not what they do."

If however you consider the Bible worthless fantasy, Truth is irrelevant and you become a victim of illusion.

Sunday, December 18, 2016

REAL Climate Chanage


Climate change is very real, however, man's activities have NOTHING to do with it. There are many factors involved all driven by solar activity but man is not one of the factors. Man made global warming is a political ploy used by the world "elite" to remove the last economic obstacle to Novus Ordo Seclorum......America!

BTW....CO2, the gas the "elite" world leaders blame on climate change, weighs 44 grams per mole. It is too dense to remain high up in the atmosphere acting as the "glass" of a greenhouse and therefore "sinks" to the surface where it is "buffered" by increase in "biomass" through photosynthesis and increased limestone deposition in bodies of water.

Why are there so many "alleged" scientists claiming man made climate change then? (notice they don't call it "global warming" any longer because of the recent "cooling" trend)  The answer is simple.......MONEY! If you oppose man made global warming you don't get government grants for your own research and worse, your reputation is ridiculed often resulting in loss of career. AND...the news media is NOT "news media"...they ARE a "climate propaganda machine" controlled by the "elite" world leaders and they will never report the vast numbers of REAL scientists who KNOW man made climate change is an illusion.   Notice they accuse people who know the truth as "climate deniers."  This is disingenuous because climate change is REAL. The "elite" expect you to believe we cause it!

 What about Bill Nye's ("the science guy") man made global warming position? Look no further than his bank acount for the answer! AND Al Gore "is no dummy....he laughs all the way to the bank!"
I taught science for 35 years and I always feared that someday we would be a nation of scientifically ignorant people. Sadly...we are there! (you can thank "common core" for that!)  Alexis deToqueville (19th Century French Dipolomat)  said in his book "Democracy in America"...Democracy will fail without an educated citizenry.

Friday, December 09, 2016

PERFECT


God is PERFECT...therefore  His Laws are PERFECT.

Debating evolution vs creation can cause many to mistrust God's PERFECT Word.  All humans need love and forgiveness AND the ONLY source of this is Jesus Christ.  Convincing people that evolution is a hoax will never bring people to repentance and accept the Grace of God through the Blood of Christ.  The Gospel is simple...Jesus Christ died to reconcile man to God.....it has nothing to do with evolution vs creation which causes confusion for both people of faith and especially atheists who will never accept that they need the saving Grace of Jesus because they assume the Bible is incompatible with science.  The ABSOLUTE TRUTH is that science verifies God's Word.  The problem is in the fundamental  interpretation of God's Word that seems to contradict science. This is sad indeed BECAUSE if we interpret God's Word through God's "gift" of science our "blind" faith in God's Word is replaced by INFORMED FAITH.  EXAMPLE......Man did NOT evolve from ape ancestors....Adam was VERY real and he was created by God in His image via recombinant DNA hybridization....."ABSOLUTE REAL INTELLIGENT DESIGN."  (God has no need or purpose in breaking His own PERFECT Laws...it is man who requires this of his Creator!)


Merry Christmas to all.... In Christ ...David 

Thursday, November 24, 2016

THE GOD OF REALITY


.
I received a interesting question from a dear e-mail friend of mind that got me thinking about the birth of Christ.  Since it is the Christmas Season I share some ideas on the topic..........

My friends question.........

 Getting close to Christmas. As a biology teacher. Have you considered the blood of Jesus had to come from being a virgin birth? What if Jesus had a blood transfusion. Would his blood been contaminated or he was pure enough that the blood would have been purified?

My response........



........ didn't have transfusions back then! Erythrocytes (red blood cells) do not have a nucleus (except in the early stages of formation in bone marrow) therefore they do not contain DNA......"purity is a condition of the DNA." (besides the cells given in a transfusion are replaced in several weeks anyway!)



Clarification…..the Virgin Birth was NOT about “parthenogenesis”…biological development of a non-fertilized ovum which produces offspring with a monoploid compliment of DNA. (half the amount…common in several plants and invertebrate animals.) Jesus was human in every way except sin…He was NOT a “haploid.”)

 The virgin birth was about DIVINITY...the "purity" is about DNA .....NOT MORALITY......Mary, His mom was 100 % Homo sapiens...she gave Jesus 23 human chromosomes (DNA) from the House of David that goes ALL the way back to Patriarch Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. (Israel) THIS fulfilled the "promise" made to Abraham through HIS righteousness given to him directly from God. The "other" 23 chromosomes (DNA) DID NOT COME FROM THIS PLANET! Those chromosomes (DNA) were "pure"...DIVINE.....from God's Eternal Cosmic Kingdom. Gabriel (an Angel of God...and Extraterrestrial I might add by definition since he was not from Earth) announced to Mary that she was FAVORED by God through her "purity in the blood line of Abraham." (being Catholic we have this in our Doctrine of the Immaculate Conception.....HER conception....VERY important concept when talking DNA and GENETICS!  She was in a “pure” state in reference to Her DNA….She was not a “haploid” either!) You don't have to be a biologist (like me!) to realize we are talking "artificial insemination."

I know that my faith would say she conceived by the Holy Spirit as recorded in Scripture WHICH IS TRUE ....HOWEVER...since the Holy Spirit of God dwells within ALL who accept God's Gift of Grace....AND there is no question Gabe was very "pure" as well... the 23 Divine chromosomes involved in the Holy Conception of the Son of God was via "artificial insemination." Scripture is NOT contradicted! (duh….Gabe didn’t do the inseminating ala’ the Nephilum. Angels are forbidden to procreate with humans)

The reason many will not understand what I am saying is that man equates sexual reproduction with morality. Sexual reproduction has NOTHING to do with morality......it is about God's PERFECT Law of "Genetic Recombination of Gene Codes." The "morality" issue occurs when man ABUSES this Law! The Conception of Jesus (Yeshua ben Joseph) in the Blessed Womb of Mary was a FULLFILLEMENT of God's PERFECT Genetic Laws AND had ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH MORALITY. Man's mind tends to be in the "gutter" which is expected since we are in a fallen state in DIRE need of the Blood of Christ to resolve our disconnect with a Holy God!!!

We know that Jesus had seemingly apparent "supernatural powers" (whatever that means!) recorded in God's Holy Word. With 50% of His DNA coming from God's Cosmic Kingdom....no wonder He could "walk on water" etc.!

Bill...the Holy Bible is ABSOLUTE TRUTH.....no mistakes...contradictions etc. The problem is that the INTERPRETATION of Scripture is illusion. God's "gift" of Science ...given at this "time" of human history actually PROVES the Bible is TRUTH. God wants INFORMED Faith..NOT blind Faith.  

 The power of positive prayer is evidence of the God of Reality and I suspect the prayer works at the "quantum level." I find it ironic that today's Scientists are BLIND to the reality of Scripture and Science.  It is VERY sad that alleged believers reject the connection between Science and the Bible





....... didn't have transfusions back then! Erythrocytes (red blood cells) do not have a nucleus (except in the early stages of formation in bone marrow) therefore they do not contain DNA......"purity is a condition of the DNA." (besides the cells given in a transfusion are replaced in several weeks anyway!)



Clarification…..the Virgin Birth was NOT about “parthenogenesis”…biological development of a non-fertilized ovum which produces offspring with a monoploid compliment of DNA. (half the amount…common in several plants and invertebrate animals.) Jesus was human in every way except sin…He was NOT a “haploid.”)

 The virgin birth was about DIVINITY...the "purity" is about DNA .....NOT MORALITY......Mary, His mom was 100 % Homo sapiens...she gave Jesus 23 human chromosomes (DNA) from the House of David that goes ALL the way back to Patriarch Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. (Israel) THIS fulfilled the "promise" made to Abraham through HIS righteousness given to him directly from God. The "other" 23 chromosomes (DNA) DID NOT COME FROM THIS PLANET! Those chromosomes (DNA) were "pure"...DIVINE.....from God's Eternal Cosmic Kingdom. Gabriel (an Angel of God...and Extraterrestrial I might add by definition since he was not from Earth) announced to Mary that she was FAVORED by God through her "purity in the blood line of Abraham." (being Catholic we have this in our Doctrine of the Immaculate Conception.....HER conception....VERY important concept when talking DNA and GENETICS!  She was in a “pure” state in reference to Her DNA….She was not a “haploid” either!) You don't have to be a biologist (like me!) to realize we are talking "artificial insemination."

I know that my faith would say she conceived by the Holy Spirit as recorded in Scripture WHICH IS TRUE ....HOWEVER...since the Holy Spirit of God dwells within ALL who accept God's Gift of Grace....AND there is no question Gabe was very "pure" as well... the 23 Divine chromosomes involved in the Holy Conception of the Son of God was via "artificial insemination." Scripture is NOT contradicted! (duh….Gabe didn’t do the inseminating ala’ the Nephilum. Angels are forbidden to procreate with humans)

The reason many will not understand what I am saying is that man equates sexual reproduction with morality. Sexual reproduction has NOTHING to do with morality......it is about God's PERFECT Law of "Genetic Recombination of Gene Codes." The "morality" issue occurs when man ABUSES this Law! The Conception of Jesus (Yeshua ben Joseph) in the Blessed Womb of Mary was a FULLFILLEMENT of God's PERFECT Genetic Laws AND had ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH MORALITY. Man's mind tends to be in the "gutter" which is expected since we are in a fallen state in DIRE need of the Blood of Christ to resolve our disconnect with a Holy God!!!

We know that Jesus had seemingly apparent "supernatural powers" (whatever that means!) recorded in God's Holy Word. With 50% of His DNA coming from God's Cosmic Kingdom....no wonder He could "walk on water" etc.!

Bill...the Holy Bible is ABSOLUTE TRUTH.....no mistakes...contradictions etc. The problem is that the INTERPRETATION of Scripture is illusion. God's "gift" of Science ...given at this "time" of human history actually PROVES the Bible is TRUTH. God wants INFORMED Faith..NOT blind Faith.  

 The power of positive prayer is evidence of the God of Reality and I suspect the prayer works at the "quantum level." I find it ironic that today's Scientists are BLIND to the reality of Scripture and Science.  It is VERY sad that alleged believers reject the connection between Science and the Bible


 

Check out my Blog.......
http://thedoubtingthomasjourney.blogspot.com/



-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Sweet
To: 'David'
Sent: Mon, Nov 21, 2016 11:24 pm
Subject: RE: signs
 

Getting close to Christmas. As a biology teacher. Have you considered the blood of Jesus had to come from being a virgin birth? What if Jesus had a blood transfusion. Would his blood been contaminated or he was pure enough that the blood would have been purified?


Friday, November 11, 2016

ALGOREisms


 
...Global warming is a cyclic process based on the Sun's cyclic processes. The reason it is NOT affected by man's alleged carbon emissions is because of the following....... the "green house effect" is based on silicon GLASS IN THE CEILING of a green house that allows sunlight to pass through and prevent loss of the warmth created by the light inside the "house" warming up the house The reason carbon can't do this is because it exists as a gas called carbon dioxide (CO2) (erroneously called a "green house gas") that weighs 44 grams per mole...it is the heaviest gas in the atmosphere (densest) and IT SINKS TO THE SURFACE OF THE EARTH and is absorbed by green plant life (mostly the microscopic phytoplankton in bodies of water) that manufactures carbohydrate nutrients and OXYGEN AND dissolves in bodies of water forming bicarbonate ions which bind to calcium ions (minerals) depositing LIMESTONE. THE RERSULT OF this is that CO2 is a BUFFERED gas...as it increases, biomass and limestone deposition increases keeping the net amount CONSTANT. The ice core studies that claimed human activity has increased CO2 to dangerous levels DID NOT take Biology and Geology into the issue. Wonder why? READ BELOW....... (BTW...ONE VOLCANO RELEASES MORE CO2 INTO THE ATMOSPHERE THAN ALL THE CARS COMBINED SINCE THE MODEL "T" FORD!.....I taught these truth to my students...they KNOW the truth)

Man made global warming is a Novus Ordo Seclorum (secular new world order) device to help control human populations and bring them under a one world EVIL government. (Brexit and the election of Donald Trump has forced the secular new order to goon the "back burner" until the time of the Biblical Tribulation.)

The news media disperses false information that all scientists are in agreement on man made global warming. I and thousands more like me KNOW THE TRUTH...so does President elect Donald Trump. MAN MADE GLOBAL WARMING IS A WEAPON OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER.

In addition....man has learned how to modify weather patterns using aluminum silicates and barium salts at high altitude ("chem trails") that absorb very high energy electromagnetic radio energy from DARPA's HAARP project.

DARPA.....The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency is an agency of the U.S. Department of Defense responsible for the development of emerging technologies for use by the military. DARPA was created in February 1958 as the Advanced Research Projects Agency by President Dwight D. Eisenhower. Its purpose was to formulate and execute research and development projects to expand the frontiers of technology and science, with the aim to reach beyond immediate military requirements. The administration was created in response to the Soviet launching of Sputnik 1 in 1957, and DARPA's mission was to ensure U.S. military technology would be more sophisticated than that of the nation's potential enemies.

HAARP.....High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program

Sounds innocent? It was in the beginning! When they found out their experiments were altering weather patterns they knew they needed a "smokescreen" to cover-up what was happening and the secular new world order that infiltrated out government after President Eisenhower suddenly knew they had a "tool" to affect world populations. THEY NEEDED A FALSE FLAG......hence..MAN MADE GLOBAL WARMING.



Thursday, November 10, 2016

POST ELECTION PROTESTING


 
It is very sad that we see so much post-election protesting, sadly in many places with violence, being propagated by the clinton supporters. (probably supported by George Soros) Some how I suspect if hilary had won it would be a lot different....sadness yes....but I doubt they would attempt to destroy our Constitution and overturn the voice of the people with petitions and violence. Protesting the opinions of others is an American right but is protesting the votes of other fellow Americans really an acceptable right?  The election is over....it is .time to heal NOT continue the protesting of the campaign!

Until the California vote came in (which went for hillary as expected, and after Donald already had the election basically won by electoral vote, Donald was leading the popular vote by hundreds of thousands......AFTER the California vote came in hilary was ahead in the popular vote by 200,000 votes. I for one would NOT appreciate the election of a president based on such a close margin AND the the vote of ONE LIBERAL STATE or possibly even votes by a state with a large population of ILLEGALS . I guess if I was a liberal I would selfishly say "go California", however, I hope I would instead realize that the "people of America" are infinitely more important than my selfish desires.

 (NOTE....just in at 6pm Nov.9.....the popular vote margin is decreasing and the trend is that Donald may actually end up winning the popular vote as well.)

ALSO...for those who hate the Electoral College...I suggest you look up the 1787 Constitutional Convention. I feared that hilary would beat Donald in the Electoral vote and be the 45th President of the United States and Donald would win the popular vote and lose the election like Governor Samuel Tilden whose monument I use to fly kites off of when I was a kid. I feared a clinton presidency so much that I would have screamed "get rid of the Electoral College" like so many are doing as I write this email.

If anything is learned by this election...it's the fact that our framers of our country were geniuses in creating the "checks and balances" of the Electoral College. Protection of our Constitutional Government "trumps" (pun intended!) the popularity of any single person running for any political office and the Electoral College PROTECTS our Constitution by protecting the election of the President.

 CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT ON THE ELCTORAL COLLEGE.......

"Some elements of the Electoral College, such as the indirect vote through intermediaries, were hotly debated at the 1787 Constitutional Convention. It was eventually justified in part as a stopgap to potentially 'reverse the vote if the people elected a criminal, traitor, or similar kind of heinous person.' The Founders wanted to empower democratic elements in the American system, but they feared a kind of pure, unrestrained democracy that had brought down great republics of the past."



The violence we see taking place as we write is VERY disturbing. The right to protest is a Constitutional right BUT NOT with violence. It is sad that the present administration is silent on this and the news media is playing it up instead of condemning it. (especially that racist Juan Williams of Fox News) 150 years ago a French political analyst Alexis DeToqueville said that a true Democracy requires a politically educated citizenry. What we have had up to today is more like "junior high student council voters." Maybe enough Americans have awakened as evidenced by the election of a non-political outsider. It would NOT have happened without the protection of our forefather's Electoral College and California could have ALONE elected a President tainted by criminal investigation. If you don't believe this is an issue, there would be no need of the present administration to consider "pardoning" the losing candidate for President. I am still perplexed that the democrat party even considered nominating a candidate with so much baggage. The republican political party DID NOT NOMINATE THE WINNING CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT.....THE PEOPLE DID! Infact.....their leadership opposed their own candidate and went with the opposition candidate......something that violates the Regan postulate. DeToqueville sure knew what he was talking about!



Tuesday, November 08, 2016

The Electoral College May SAVE America




hillary & The FBI  and DOJ....... Corruption and  FBI problems at end of email.................??????







.......SEEMS scary (article at end) .....but believe it or not......our forefathers designed a "checks and balances" to prevent such a problem...THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE.   The delegates of each state are pledged but NOT obligated by law to vote for the states winner. The winner of tonight's election is NOT President Elect UNTIL the Electoral College  holds its vote the Monday after the second Wednesday in December following the election.  It is at this time we have a "President Elect."  



The following quote reveals the "checks and balances" in the electoral system......(Entire article on the Electoral College is below the quote and comment.......)



"Some elements of the Electoral College, such as the indirect vote through intermediaries, were hotly debated at the 1787 Constitutional Convention. It was eventually justified in part as a stopgap to potentially 'reverse the vote if the people elected a criminal, traitor, or similar kind of heinous person.' The Founders wanted to empower democratic elements in the American system, but they feared a kind of pure, unrestrained democracy that had brought down great republics of the past."



With the FBI changing it's mind every week and more WikiLeaks coming and the statements made by the New York Police Department.....no matter who is elected tonight.....there is plenty of time for ANYTHING TO HAPPEN TO CLINTON AND OR TRUMP! (Trump may also be under investigation)





Why We Use Electoral College, Not Popular Vote



America’s presidential election system was designed to empower the states, not just the American people as an undifferentiated mass

Commentary By




Jarrett Stepman is an editor for The Daily Signal. Send an email to Jarrett.

The Electoral College remains in place over two centuries after the framers of the Constitution empowered it to select presidents. Though occasionally maligned, this system of electing a chief executive has been incredibly successful for the American people.

Many modern voters might be surprised to learn that when they step into a ballot box to select their candidate for president, they actually are casting a vote for fellow Americans called electors. These electors, appointed by the states, are pledged to support the presidential candidate the voters have supported. The Electoral College holds its vote the Monday after the second Wednesday in December following the election.

The Founding Fathers created the Electoral College after much debate and compromise, but it has provided stability to the process of picking presidents. Though the winner of the national popular vote typically takes the presidency, that vote failed to determine the winner in four elections: 1824, 1876, 1888, and 2000.

Some see the Electoral College as a peculiar and mystifying institution that ensures only a few, select individuals will ever cast a direct vote for president in the United States. Others complain that the system rewards smaller states with more proportional power than the large ones.

Every four years, around election time, there are murmurs about revamping the system and moving toward a direct, national popular vote.

The Founders’ College

As one of The Heritage Foundations legal experts, Hans von Spakovsky, noted in a paper on the Electoral College: “In creating the basic architecture of the American government, the Founders struggled to satisfy each state’s demand for greater representation while attempting to balance popular sovereignty against the risk posed to the minority from majoritarian rule.”

Some elements of the Electoral College, such as the indirect vote through intermediaries, were hotly debated at the 1787 Constitutional Convention. It was eventually justified in part as a stopgap to potentially reverse the vote if the people elected a criminal, traitor, or similar kind of heinous person. The Founders wanted to empower democratic elements in the American system, but they feared a kind of pure, unrestrained democracy that had brought down great republics of the past.

The product of the Founders’ compromise has been well balanced and enduring, and we would be wise to leave it intact.

Alexander Hamilton defended the Electoral College in Federalist 68. He argued that it was important for the people as a whole to have a great deal of power in choosing their president, but it was also “desirable” that “the immediate election should be made by men most capable of analyzing the qualities adapted to the station, and acting under circumstances favorable to deliberation, and to a judicious combination of all the reasons and inducements which were proper to govern their choice.”

Hamilton also wrote that this system of intermediaries would produce a greater amount of stability, and that an “ … intermediate body of electors will be much less apt to convulse the community with any extraordinary or violent movements, than the choice of one who was himself to be the final object of the public wishes.”

As students of ancient history, the Founders feared the destructive passions of direct democracy, and as recent subjects of an overreaching monarch, they equally feared the rule of an elite unresponsive to the will of the people. The Electoral College was a compromise, neither fully democratic nor aristocratic.

The Constitution states:

Each state shall appoint, in such manner as the legislature thereof may direct, a number of electors, equal to the whole number of senators and representatives to which the state may be entitled in the Congress.

In addition to balancing the protection of individual rights and majority rule, the Founding Fathers attempted to create a “federalist” system that would keep most of policymaking power reserved to states and localities. America’s presidential election system also was designed to empower the states, not just the American people as an undifferentiated mass.

The total number of electors and thus electoral votes across all states and the District of Columbia—included after the passage of the 23rd Amendment—adds up to 538. The winner must receive a majority, or 270, of these votes to become president.

The system empowers states, especially smaller ones, because it incentivizes presidential candidates to appeal to places that may be far away from population centers. Farmers in Iowa may have very different concerns than bankers in New York. A more federalist system of electing presidents takes that into account.

The states are free to select the method in which they choose their electors. In the early days of the republic, most states chose to have their legislatures pick electors, rather than the people. But, over time, the states shifted to choosing electors via the state’s popular vote instead. Every state has opted for popular election at least since the Civil War.

Calls to Abolish

Modern opponents of the Electoral College argue against what they call antidemocratic aspects of the institution, criticizing both the intermediary electors and the state-by-state system of voting.

Calls to fundamentally change the Electoral College reached a peak after Republican George W. Bush defeated Democrat Al Gore in the tightly contested 2000 election. Gore narrowly won the national popular vote, and many of his supporters howled that the system—even without the Supreme Court stepping in—was unfair.

One organization, National Popular Vote, has worked toward eliminating the Electoral College through an amendment to the Constitution or a state compact. National Popular Vote argues that the current system encourages presidential candidates to spend most of their time in “swing states” rather than campaigning for votes across the entire country.

This plan for a national popular vote has received a moderate level of support, but Heritage’s von Spakovsky has called it bad policy, based on mistaken assumptions. Swing states, he wrote, “can change from election to election, and many states that are today considered to be reliably ‘blue’ or ‘red’ in the presidential race were recently unpredictable.”

Many states have signed on to a bill that essentially would tie a state’s electoral votes to the national popular vote. Those states will pledge to swing all of their electoral votes to the winner of the national vote.

But this is because the incentives would be to appeal only to the biggest population centers. Swing states change over time, and the 2016 election could be a prime example of swing-state unpredictability and erosion of the traditional partisan political map.

Additionally, if the president were elected by unfiltered national vote, small and rural states would become irrelevant, and campaigns would spend their time in large, populous districts.

Over 200 Years of Success

Unneeded tinkering with a process that is over two centuries old could destabilize one on the steadiest political systems in the world.

As author and Texas lawyer Tara Ross wrote in a Heritage Foundation memorandum:

America’s election systems have operated smoothly for more than 200 years because the Electoral College accomplishes its intended purposes. America’s presidential election process preserves federalism, prevents chaos, grants definitive electoral outcomes, and prevents tyrannical or unreasonable rule. The Founding Fathers created a stable, well-planned, and carefully designed system—and it works.

On Election Day, Americans should appreciate the great and long-lasting constitutional tradition bequeathed to them—including the quirky Electoral College system created by the nation’s Founders.



SCARY ARTICLE...........................



  Some truth, some speculation.  The first paragraph is pure speculation and a guess as to why Comey caved to the Clintons.

 

There is no question that the game is rigged, but it isn’t easy to prove it.  The players are too good at it. 

America is now like a third world country, the government is corrupt and in full control.  There is no two party system and no checks and balances.











Just passing this on... quite likely our next President!  







Lynch and Obama made it clear to Comey that, if he pressed for an indictment, he would be taking the Democrat nominee for president out of the election. If he failed to get a conviction, then he would be facing charges of tampering with and changing the outcome of a federal election, to which he would be facing the rest of his life in prison, and Obama and Lynch, as well as others, would see to it that he did. Now you know why he presented his case the way he did and why it was so obvious he was reluctant to not press for an indictment. 

Hillary's statement to the FBI was intentionally given without a court reporter present or without any recording of her testimony to prevent her from having any further exposure to legal charges such as perjury. If she lied to Congress, they have no written FBI deposition to confront Hillary with. This was set up to let her walk without fear of being charged with giving False Testimony or being charged with Obstruction of Justice. This is what those in the "legalese world" call a "Straw Man" legal charge. (It is a charge designed to make someone, especially lawyers, appear innocent of the charges!) 



EXAMPLE: Bill beats up Shirley at their home. Bill is arrested for "Felony Spousal Abuse" . Bill's lawyer gets the charges dismissed because Bill is not married to Shirley! (They are only "live-in boyfriend and girlfriend".) Bill walks out of court totally exonerated of the charges––thanks to a technicality! The twist in the case is the arresting officer knew all along Bill was not married to Shirley, because the officer and Bill are old fraternity brothers. The officer intentionally charged Bill with something he knew would not stick. Bill would easily have been convicted of Assault and Battery, but he was not charged with that! This is what is known as the "STRAW MAN" charge. It is how you make a guilty person appear innocent. This is exactly what was done with the Hillary Clinton case! 

If she had been charged with "Destruction of Government Documents", she would have easily been convicted, because she admitted to doing this! Instead, she was charged with "Mishandling Classified Documents" which has wiggle room for reasonable doubt regarding Criminal Intent! I think citizens are finally fed up with the Clintons and the cesspool of corruption that is our current government. Real Americans are ready to take our country back. All of these years of corruption have taken a toll on American lives. Citizens' opinions of a lying White House, a corrupt Congress, the "pay to play" politicians, the legalese lawyers and lobbyists, big overspending "welfare mentality" government, the "looking for a loop hole" justice system, the lying media, and our censored educational system with an agenda to dumb down the next generation, is at its lowest point ever. Hillary is on the wrong side of every issue. 

The British Exit from the EU (Brexit) is just a small sign that real citizens of civilized nations are ready to take their country back. They are sick of the results of open borders and globalization led by power-hungry elitists. Hillary Clinton has no character or integrity. She is an arrogant, condescending political elite who is only interested in lining the Clinton pockets with donations to the Clinton Foundation (wink, wink) from PACs, lobbyists, and foreign nations that buy access and favors.



The Clinton Foundation is nothing more than an operation used to launder money for the Clintons and other politicians involved in illegal activities. The Clintons are able to use the information of those participating to obtain cover for their activities, or blackmail those who are laundering money through them. Just count the number of politicians who arrive in Washington with nothing, but then leave as millionaires and billionaires. Did their votes serve in the best interest of their constituents or did they only benefit themselves? If the representatives of your state fall in this category, then I suggest an investigation be launched.

FYI....It has come to light that Comey was (or still is) on the Board of Directors of the HSBC Bank where the Clinton Foundation has holdings.



ED KLEIN who wrote the book on the Clintons, now published and available -- said Hillary was called to the office of Valerie Jarrett and Obama back in 2009 and told her she had to stop sending emails thru her personal server ––– OBVIOUSLY SHE DIDN'T LISTEN TO THEM. So, YES, Obama knew and Jarrett knew and Huma knew, ... along with how many others!!!!

"FBI Director James Comey basically delivered a coded message to the American People and the world. He said...she is guilty beyond any reasonable doubt, certainly should not be president, and should be brought to justice ... However, our country has been infiltrated and is basically corrupt.



Another key point is in what Comey said:  There were 80 email chains, which means an exchange between people, ... Hillary sending AND RECEIVING, ... so if he charges Hillary, he has to charge the others in the chain. What if the exchange is with Obama? It is not a stretch to think the Sec of State would be in email contact with PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES).

Let's just say...Bill went to Loretta and said shut this down...or else if Hillary is charged she will tell under oath that some of the emails were with the President...so he is also guilty of a felony...THAT is IMPEACHABLE .




The law firm Kahn worked for is also the law firm for the royal court of Saudi Arabia and the tax lawyers for the Clintons and for the Clinton Foundation. It is also the firm Loretta Lynch worked for. They also represent a small Tech firm in Denver Colorado. which so happens to be the same Tech firm that managed Hillary's private server. Coincidence?

Sunday, September 18, 2016

Christian Diaspora?


 My comment to article below………..









 Christians, especially American Christians, are responsible for the rise of islamic terrorism in today's world and God WILL hold us accountable BECAUSE His Son Yeshua ben Joseph (Jesus the Christ) WARNED the world that "false prophets" would come after Him.  According to Jude 3, ALL religious figures after 75 AD are FALSE.  It is obvious that many who claim to be followers of Christ fail to "trust" the words of the Lord Jesus from the Crusades when islam attempted to destroy the teachings of Christ all the way to today with political correctness and tolerance allowing islam to infiltrate and take over the world.  Thousands of years ago the Jews failed to trust and obey God when they became tolerant of the Philistines against God's will and allowed them to proliferate and we know the result of that....."The Diaspora."    Is history repeating itself? God has brought  the Jews back to their "homeland", will He do the same for Gentiles?



ARTICLE…………………





Please note the part in quotes below.  You hear of it every day on the news.



THIS  ISSUE IS EVEN MORE PRONOUNCED  AT THIS TIME SINCE THE  MARINE WHOSE DAUGHTER (IN LA PLATA, MD SCHOOL ) RECEIVED  A  FAILING GRADE IN HISTORY BECAUSE SHE REFUSED TO TAKE THE ISLAM STUDY  COURSE ....INCIDENTALLY   NO ALTERNATIVE COURSE WAS OFFERED.  HER MARINE FATHER BROUGHT THIS TO THE FOREFRONT   ...SINCE HE FOUGHT IN IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN , AND IS VERY AWARE OF HOW  DANGEROUS THIS RELIGION IS...DEFINITELY NOT ONE OF PEACE. 

     When we get 100,000,000, that's one  hundred million willing Christians to BOND together, voice their concerns and vote, we can take  back America with God's help.  Become one of the One hundred million... Then let's get 200 million.  It can be done just by sending this email to your  friends. Do the math. It only takes a single willing  heart and a fed up SOUL. God  Bless Americaand Shine your light  on Her!

     “Now President Obama is encouraging schools to teach the Quran for extra credit, while at the same time, they cannot even talk about the Bible, God, pray, or salute the American Flag.”



  The direction this country is headed should strike fear in the heart  of  every Christian, especially knowing that the Muslim religion  believes that if Christians cannot be converted, they should be annihilated

   



 Tolerance cannot afford to have anything to do with the fallacy that evil may convert itself to good !






Tuesday, July 12, 2016

The Problem with Science AND Religion


The problem for Creationists and Scientists is that they BOTH reject each other's basic premise.  There is no question that the Bible is the absolute inerrant Truth, however, the literal, fundamental, Creationist  interpretation of it is NOT, therefore Scientists unfortuneately do not realize that God's "gift" of Science reveals the absolute Truth revealed in the Bible. ALL Scripture can be verified by Scientific analysis.

Examples......

.......Adam was created in God's Image from the "dust" of the Earth. Carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen and phosphorous are the elements of DNA.....certainly qualifies as "Earth dust." Since God is PERFECT His LAWS ARE PERFECT so  obviously God Created Adam via Recombinant DNA hybridization.... NOT Darwinian Natural Selection of Simian stock. (Not enough "time" because of the "lethal" nature of DNA mutation...the ONLY source of "new" genetic information. Adam contained "divine DNA from God's Cosmic Family).......

.......Eve was created from a "rib" of Adam and when she was presented to him "all grown up after Adam's deep sleep"...he exclaimed "At last this is flesh of my flesh and bone of my bone, I will call her 'women' because she comes from man."  Since the "rib" is the richest and easily accessible source of adult stem cells which are easily "re-set" to an early embryonic state (Induced Pluripotency), obviously Eve is a "modified clone" of Adam.."flesh of his flesh and bone of his bone." The "deep sleep" obviously was a suspended animation to allow Eve to grow into a sexually mature women.)   Two IPScells are involved.  The "Y" chromosome of one is removed and discarded. The cell is saved. An "X" chromosome is removed from the second IPScell and is inserted into the nucleus of the first cell which is easily induced to start cleavage and form a blastocyst which is implanted into a surrogate womb (in vitro) where gestation is completed and 9 months "baby Eve" is born. Obviously this is the Science but the Creationist would say God violated His PEFECT Laws and crated Eve as a grown woman!  God does NOT violate ANYTHING...man does!

Monday, June 06, 2016

Why?


 I am perplexed as to why Creationists reject the Big Bang when it actually supports their fundamental literal interpretation of Genesis. Frankly, it seems Creationists are VERY selective as to which Scientific revelations they accept and which they reject. If it doesn't support their fundamental interpretation of Scripture, they reject it as pseudoscience.  Sadly the result of this superficial view of God's inerrant Word and absolute truth in the Bible, is that they tend to accept pseudoscience over the evidence revealed in God's "gift" of the Scientific Method because it appears to be incompatible with their fundamental interpretation of Scripture.




 Fundamental Christians often quote the following Scripture that I believe tends to create a fear and mistrust in Science.......Isaiah 55:8-9......




8 “For my thoughts are not your thoughts,

neither are your ways my ways,” declares the Lord. 9 As the heavens are higher than the earth,

so are my ways higher than your ways

and my thoughts than your thoughts."


 I submit God was NOT talking about His "gift" of Science because there was no Science back in Biblical times.  I believe God was refering to His Love, Compassion, Patience, Forgiveness, Holiness, etc.  God is PERFECT...His Laws are PERFECT...and we are Created in His Image therefore....... discovering and understanding His PERFECT Laws that govern reality is expected and in no way violates Isaiah 55:8-9.  God's "gift" of Science allows man to discern truth from illusions especially in this time of restoration of the planet to God's Kingdom upon the arival of His Son Jesus Christ as King of Kings and Lord of Lords. (ie; The pseudoscience of "manmade global warming" has ONE purpose...to eventually destroy America's economy and thereby remove America as the last obstacle to the fufillment of Novus Ordo Seclorum...the "secular new world order."




Atheists reject the Bible because they too believe it is contradictory to Scientific revelation and therefore pure fantasy.  The problem is NOT that the Bible is incompatible with Science...it is the "fundamental, literal" interpretation that IS incompatible with Science and logic.  Sadly, because of this way too many Scientists reject the truth and wisdom revealed in God’s PERFECT Word.  So much of what Science has discovered through the Scientific Method is verified in the Holy Bible in disease, medicine, agriculture, Astrophysics and  even Cosmology……”In My Father’s House there are many Mansions.”  (there’s a lot more to this than “rooms”or dwelling places and it is more than obvious that the “House” is God’s Cosmos..the CREATION!)



Modern Cosmology is tending to a model based on quantum mechanics that the “Big Bang” was just ONE of an infinite number of “space-time-matter inflations” which is compatible with an infinite God that always existed and always will exist and never had a “beginning” which is revealed in God’s Word.

Saturday, May 07, 2016

An Inconvenient Truth REVISITED




CO2 is a buffered gas....it weighs 44 g/mole....biomass and limestone deposition has constantly increased since the Industrial Revolution....CONNECT the dots.






Here are some dots………





An Inconvenient Truth: Liberal Climate Inquisition Can’t Explain Past Temperature Changes



   David Kreutzer



David Kreutzer is the senior research fellow in energy economics and climate change at The Heritage Foundation's Center for Data Analysis. In this position, Kreutzer researches how energy and climate change legislation will affect economic activity at the national, local, and industry levels. Read his research.







In the week prior to the administration signing what should constitute an international climate treaty, one think tank, the Competitive Enterprise Institute, was subpoenaed for casting doubt on the agreement’s associated science of climate catastrophe.



As disturbing as such thuggery from state attorneys general would be in any case, the premise of the subpoena is faulty. The Competitive Enterprise Institute did not cast doubt on the dubious climate science. The actual data cast the doubt. The think tank and others have simply pointed out what the data show.



It looks like thoughtcrime has now moved from George Orwell’s novel “1984” to the twisted reality of our judicial system. Pointing out facts should never be a real crime.



The Heritage Foundation’s new Paris-bubble-popping science summary is also a case of letting the numbers tell a story. A story many never hear in the media-hyped spectacle that is international climate policy.





DS-climate-science-termperatures-700











For instance, the chart above shows reconstructed average world temperature data for the past 500,000 years. Depending on the magnification and size of your monitor, each pencil dot would span something on the order of 1,000 years. The myriad 10-degree Celsius temperature flips all happened before man-made carbon dioxide could have had any impact—the final temperature spike started at the end of the last ice age.



Now see if you can follow this: The “science thought police” insist that even though none of the temperature variations for the first 499,950 years had anything to do with human activity, virtually none of the temperature increases of the past 50 years had anything to do with nature. Got it?



A question some overzealous attorneys general might be asking right now is, “Where did this ‘denier’ data come from?” The answer is: the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Climatic Data Center website (to be very clear, it is part of the federal government).



If those who merely point to data that are inconsistent with an imminent climate crisis are thought criminals, how much more subpoena worthy would be those who actually created the data? This expands the thoughtcrime conspiracy to an entirely new set of perps.



Should the hyperventilating attorneys general subpoena the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in its entirety or just the researchers? If donors to think tanks are subpoenaed simply because the think tanks pointed to this data, should not the U.S. Treasury be subpoenaed for actually funding these doubt-creating data?



In any event, it seems disingenuous to wave off huge past temperature changes as entirely natural while branding as science-denying fraudsters those who assert that natural forces are likely still to be playing a significant role. This is a problem for the U.N. Climate Agreement and its signers.



If natural forces have played a significant role in the moderate and unsteady temperature increases of the past 60 years, then what’s the climate hysteria about? If there is no need for hysteria, there is no need for the Paris climate agreement.


Friday, May 06, 2016

micro vs MACRO




There are huge differences between micro-evolution and macro-evolution and until those differences are understood by parties defending "Intelligent Design" vs "Darwinism" , no one will understand the God revealed in the "flesh": 2000 years ago in the Incarnation of Yeshua ben Joseph. (Jesus the Christ) and the reality of "Intelligent Design." 





    

DARWIN vs INTELLIGENT DESIGN





It is critically important to understand there is a difference between micro-evolution and macro-evolution.  Discussing Evolution and Intelligent Design logically is not possible unless both sides of the issue understand this difference. There is no question, even from Creationists, that Darwinian Natural Selection IS involved in genetic change that creates antibiotic resistant pathogens. 



At the root of the controversy is the creation of Adam and Eve...the first humans on the planet.  Science claims man evolved from Simians via Natural Selection. Creationists claim God created man from the "dust" of the Earth via "Intelligent Design."  The Truth is that Science is WRONG because of Scientific reasons and Creationists are RIGHT but for the WRONG reasons.   



The cause of the confusion must be shared by both sides.  Science rejects the wisdom and truth revealed in the Bible and Creationists reject Science out of perceived fear it is incompatible with God's Word.   The Truth is that Science has verified the absolute truth revealed in the Bible.  The alleged incompatibility is the result of the fundamental literal interpretation of the Bible by Creationists...NOT because the Bible is fantasy and full of errors and contradictions as atheists claim. Ironically, Scientific interpretation of the Bible  eliminates all alleged errors , contradictions AND fantasy.



We know that God’s Word reveals that there are many “secrets” that cannot be understood until a future time.  There are many events that are “signs” that reveal these “secrets”, however….I submit that Science is the critical “future” factor that ultimately reveals the Bible’s “secrets.”



Micro evolution involves genetic change within lower phyla.  As stated above…..the  creation of antibiotic resistant pathogens is evidence of process.  The evolution of Homo sapiens from Simian stock however would necessitate macro evolution.  Macro-evolution requires very long periods of “time” because of the time required between generations where natural selection acts. The quantum jump from ape to man was NOT possible on Earth time standards, there has to be a different explanation for the sudden appereance of man. 



Creationists are correct that man was crated by “Ingelligent Design”…however, the mechanism they claim is “magic” (supernatural) They claim this because they do not understand the nature of God revealed in the “flesh” 2000 years ago in the Incarnation iof Yeshua ben Joseph…Jesus the Christ.  God is NOT an “anthropomorphic superbeing”..He is “Elohim” a plural Hebrew word which cannot be resolved with the Christian Doctrine if the Trinity because Father, Son and Holy Spirit are “manifestations” of ONE God…NOT three separate gods.  (NOTE: the following Scriptures reveal the nature of the True God of existence……  Genesis 1:26, Psalm 82:3-6, John 14:8-23, Galatians 3:26-28, Colossians 1:27, 2:9-10, 1 Corinthians:3:16-17, 1 Corinthians 6:19-20, 1 John 4:11-16)



As soon as a person understands this true God revealed in Jesus…..the “Elohim”…and understands that God’s Laws are PERFECT and God has no “need” to violate His own Laws….the alleged “supernatural”….  they WILL know that Science has discovered how God Created Adam from the “dust” of the Earth in God’s Image, even though Science has no clue that they have because they have rejected the Truth and Wisdom revealed in the Bible.  The Truth is that Adam was Created by God via Recombinant DNA which is made up of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen and phosphorous…the “DUST OF THE EARTH.”



 (AND Eve was a modified clone of Adam….a .”Y” chromosome was replaced by an “X” in the Induced Pluripotent Stem cell from Adams ”rib” marrow that formed a blastocyst and completed morphogenesis /gestation in a surrogate womb (in vitro)  and 9 months later “little baby Eve” was born.    Adam was placed in a “deep sleep” because when God presented Eve to him...she was a sexually mature young women….”At last…this is flesh of my flesh and bone of my bone...I will call her women because SHE COMES FROM MAN…,Scripture  fulfilled by God’s PEFECT Laws!!)